Was Vitagold Coccidiosis Control Mash exempt animal feed?

Short answer No. California taxed it because the label described short-term medication, toxicity in excess quantities, and a slaughter-withdrawal period.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 110.1320
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1957-01-14
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A Board audit office asking whether five Vitagold poultry and rabbit products were nontaxable feed

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1957. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1957
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an internal California State Board of Equalization legal memorandum dated January 14, 1957, published by CDTFA as support for Annotation 110.1320. It is a separately indexed copy of the same five-product correspondence supporting Annotation 110.1340; this page focuses on the taxable Coccidiosis Control Mash. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current medicated-feed, coccidiosis-control, nitrophenide, toxicity, drug-residue, slaughter-withdrawal, exemption, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Vitagold Coccidiosis Control Mash with 0.05% nitrophenide did not qualify as exempt feed under Ruling 47 as then cited. Its retail sale was taxable.

The submitted label said the product could not be fed longer than three days without changing to nonmedicated feed, warned that excess quantities could be toxic, and required three days after medication stopped before birds could be slaughtered for food. Counsel therefore treated it as medication rather than feed.

This PDF is a separately indexed copy of the same five-product correspondence supporting Annotation 110.1340. That annotation focuses on the four other Vitagold products classified as exempt feed; this page preserves Annotation 110.1320's medicated-mash focus.

Citations and references

  • California State Board of Equalization Ruling 47 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

110.1320
Sacramento
January 14, 1957

To:

San Diego - Auditing

From:

Headquarters – Sales Tax Counsel (WWM:JDP)

Re:

S--- D--- C--- P--- A--XX XXnd Street
--- ---, California

Account.

SR -- XX-XXXXXX
F-XXX

In your memorandum of November 8, 1956, you request an opinion regarding the status of five products with respect to their classification as non-taxable feeds. “Vitagold Broiler-Fryer Mash”, “Vitagold Bunny-Ade Pellets”, “Vitagold Turkey PreStarter” and Vitagold Chlortetracycline Poultry Mix” are exempt feeds within the meaning of ruling 47. However, we do not regard “Vitagold Coccidiosis Control Mash with 0.05% Nitrophenide” as an exempt feed within the meaning of ruling 47. In reaching this conclusion we have taken into consideration the feeding instructions on the back of the submitted label. Therein it states:

“Feed as the sole ration but do NOT feed longer than three days at one time without changing to non-medicated feed. In excess quantities this feed can be toxic to the birds. WARNING: Do not slaughter any birds for food until three (3) days after medication has stopped to allow time for elimination of the drugs from edible tissues.” Since the product cannot be used for a period of over three days without being harmful to the birds, we cannot regard it as a feed. Accordingly, the tax will apply to the retail sales thereof.

Warren W. Mangels

JDP:ro

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1957. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace