Was pomace processed with molasses exempt when sold as cattle feed?

Short answer Yes, when sold as feed. California distinguished exempt nutritive cattle roughage from taxable pomace sold as a soil conditioner.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 110.1100
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1956-05-18
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A Board compliance office asking about pomace processed with molasses

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1956. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1956
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an internal California State Board of Equalization legal memorandum dated May 18, 1956, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. Its result depends on pomace being sold and used as cattle feed rather than as a soil conditioner, and it notes nutritive value can depend on processing. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current pomace, molasses, cattle-feed, roughage, soil-conditioner, product-use, exemption, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Pomace was exempt when sold as cattle feed. The Agriculture Department advised that pomace was used as roughage and could have nutritional value depending on how it was processed; adding molasses strengthened the feed classification.

Product use controlled the result. The memorandum distinguished taxable pomace sold as a soil conditioner from exempt pomace sold as feed.

Citations and references

  • No specific statute or regulation was cited in the published memorandum.

Source

Original ruling text

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

110.1100
Sacramento
May 18, 1956

To:

Stockton – Compliance (ETB)

From:

Headquarters – Sales Tax Counsel (BH:JJD)

Re:

L--- D--- Company
XXX --- ----- ---, California

Account No. K-XXXXX

We regret the delay in replying to your inquiry of December 5, 1955, concerning the taxing of sales of Pomace processed with molasses. You stated that this office has held sales of Pomace to farmers as a taxable transaction. This is true when the Pomace is sold as a soil conditioner. However, we have been advised by the Department of Agriculture that Pomace isused as roughage for cattle and that it does have nutritive value depending on the degree to which it is processed. It is our opinion that the sale of Pomace as a feed would be exempt. The addition of molasses would, of course, bolster the argument for exemption.

Bill Holden
JJD:tl

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1956. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace