Were tropical breeding fish exempt when bought by a business that raised and sold their offspring?

Short answer No. California taxed the breeding fish because tropical fish were not ordinary food animals and the breeders themselves were not bought for resale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 110.0340
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1952-12-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A tropical-fish breeder asking about feed, medicine, breeding fish, and tank equipment purchases

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1952. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1952
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter dated December 22, 1952, separately published by CDTFA as support for Annotation 110.0340. It is the same correspondence supporting Annotation 110.0700; this page focuses on the breeding-fish purchase. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current tropical-fish, breeding-stock, resale, feed, medicine, tank-equipment, exemption, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tropical breeding fish bought by a breeder were taxable. The letter understood tropical fish not to be a kind ordinarily used for human food, and the purchased breeding fish themselves were not bought for resale.

The same correspondence exempted feed because the resulting fish were sold in the regular course of business, but taxed medicine, tanks, and heating or filtering equipment.

This PDF is a separately indexed copy of the same correspondence supporting Annotation 110.0700. That annotation focuses on fish feed and medicine; this page preserves Annotation 110.0340's breeding-fish focus.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6358 (as cited)
  • California State Board of Equalization Rulings 14 and 47 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

110.0340

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

December 22, 1952

Your letter of August 21


Dear --- --- ---:

You inquire as to the application of the sales tax to purchases by a person engaged in the business of raising and selling tropical fish. Your question directly concerns the application of the tax to purchases of fish food, medicine, breeding fish, and equipment for heating and filtering tanks. Section 6358 of the California Sales and Use Tax Law exempts from the sales tax gross receipts from sales of any form of animal life of a kind the products of which ordinarily constitute food for human consumption. That section also exempts sales of feed for any form of animal life of a kind the products of which ordinarily constitute food for human consumption, or are to be sold in the regular course of business. See also Sales and Use Tax Ruling 47 (copy enclosed). Accordingly, the sales tax does not apply to sales to you of feed inasmuch as that feed is for animal life to be sold in the regular course of business. On the other hand, the sales tax does apply to your purchases of medicines and your purchases of breeding fish. The sales to you of breeding fish are taxable in view of our understanding that tropical fish are not a form of animal life of a kind which ordinarily constitute food for human consumption. Your purchases of tanks and other equipment are, of course, subject to the sales tax pursuant to Ruling 14, (copy enclosed). If you fee that you have over-paid to this Board, we would suggest that you file a claim for refund. No special form is required and it may be in the form of a letter. It must be in writing and must state the specific grounds upon which the claim is founded. Claims must be filed within three years from the last day of the month following the close of the quarterly period for whichever payment is made.

--- --- ---

-2-

December 22, 1952
110.0340

It facilitates investigating claims for refund if the claimant indicates the amount and periods involved. We are sorry that we temporarily mislaid your letter. Very truly yours,

W. W. Mangels
Assistant Counsel
WWM:ja

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1952. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace