Was a trust's transfer of a hot-air balloon to a new corporation taxable when the trust received only all of the corporation's first-issue stock?

Short answer No, on the stated assumptions. A balloon was not aircraft under Regulation 1610, but a transfer solely for first-issue stock of a commencing corporation was nontaxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 105.0131
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-03-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel asking whether a trust's transfer of a hot-air balloon solely for first-issue stock of a new corporation was taxable

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization senior-tax-counsel letter dated March 28, 1991, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. Its no-tax conclusion assumes the balloon was transferred to a still-commencing corporation solely for first-issue stock, with no cash, notes, debt assumption, or accumulated corporate assets giving the stock measurable value. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current balloon, aircraft-definition, corporate-contribution, occasional-sale, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A revocable trust transferred a 1980 hot-air balloon to a new corporation solely in exchange for all of the corporation's first-issue stock. The trustor continued using the balloon personally after the transfer.

Tax counsel first clarified that the Board did not treat a balloon as aircraft under Regulation 1610. The transfer therefore followed the general rules for tangible personal property, not aircraft-specific rules. The letter assumed the trust was a retailer and the transaction was not an occasional sale.

Even on that assumption, neither sales nor use tax applied if the corporation was still commencing and the trust received only first-issue stock. Regulation 1595 treated that stock as having no measurable value because its value was speculative.

The answer depended on no other consideration—such as cash, notes, or assumed debt—and on the corporation not accumulating assets that made the issued stock measurably valuable before the transfer.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006.5, 6012, 6019, 6051, and 6367 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1595 and 1610 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

105.0131

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

March 28, 1991

Ms. S--- S--Law Offices of
---, -- & ----- ---, XXXX --- ----- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
H--- A--- I---, Inc.
SP UT XX-XXXXXX
Dear Ms. S---:
This is reply to your January 31, 1991 letter regarding the application of sales and use tax on the transfer of an aircraft under the following facts you presented: “Mr. R--- J. F--- (‘F---’) is the sole trustor and sole trustee of a revocable intervivos trust (The R. J. F---Trust No. 1, u/a dated September 10, 1975; the ‘Trust’) established for the sole benefit of F--- during his lifetime. At the time of the transfer, the Trust owned several aircraft which were used by F--- for his personal use and enjoyment. “H--- A--- I---, Inc. (‘Corporation’) is a corporation formed under the laws of the State of California. At the time of the transfer of the aircraft into the Corporation, the Corporation had no outstanding stock. The Trust transferred one of the aircraft that it owned to the Corporation solely in exchange for 100% of the outstanding stock of the Corporation. The aircraft that was transferred to the Corporation was wholly owned by the Trust, and neither F--- nor the Trust received any consideration, such as cash, notes or an assumption of indebtedness (if any) in connection with the transfer of the aircraft to the Corporation. F--- has continued to use the aircraft for his personal use and enjoyment following the transfer of the aircraft to the Corporation.

Ms. S--- S---

-2-

March 28, 1991
105.0131

“The Trust is not and will not be bound to transfer any of its stock in the Corporation.” You inquired with two letters each concerning the identical facts quoted above. We answered your other letter with the assumption that the aircraft is as defined in Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1610, Vehicles, Vessels and Aircraft. However, we note that information this Board received from the Federal Aviation Administration shows that R--- J. F---, Trustee, transferred a 1980 Raven Balloon to H--- A--- I---, Inc. We assume that the balloon is the aircraft to which you refer. This Board has taken the position that a balloon is not an aircraft for purposes of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1610. Therefore, the application of sales and use tax to the transfer of the balloon is the same as the application of tax to sales of tangible personal property in general. For purposes of this opinion, we will assume that the Trust has made more than two retail sales of tangible personal property during the preceding 12-month period such that the Trust is a retailer and the sale is not an exempt occasional sale. (Cf. Rev. & Tax. Code
§§ 6006.5, 6019, 6367.) If the Trust is a retailer and makes a retail sale of a balloon in California, the applicable tax is the sales tax imposed on the gross receipts of the retail sale. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) The issue here is whether the stock transferred by the corporation to the Trust in exchange for the aircraft constitutes “gross receipts”. “Gross receipts” means the total amount of the sale or rental price, as the case may be, of the retail sales of retailers, valued in money, whether received in money or otherwise. (Rev. & Tax Code § 6012.) As you know, Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1595, Occasional Sales, subdivision (b)(4) provides: “Tax does not apply to a transfer of property to a commencing corporation or commencing partnership in exchange solely for first issue stock of the commencing corporation or an interest in the commencing partnership. Tax does apply, however, if the transferor receives consideration such as cash, notes, or an assumption of indebtedness, and the transfer does not otherwise qualify for exemption. The tax is measured by the amount of such consideration attirbutable to the tangible personal property transferred.” The rule that tax does not apply to a transfer of property to a commencing corporation in exchange solely for the first issue stock of a commencing corporation is predicated on the first issue stock of a commencing corporation not having a measurable value, because any value is only speculative. Under the facts you provided, tax does not apply to the Trust’s sale of the aircraft to the Corporation provided that the Corporation was a commencing corporation at the time of the transfer. You first contacted us in 1986 regarding these transactions. We assume that the Corporation did not accrue corporate assets in the meantime that would make the stock issued have a measurable value such that the Corporation would be providing a consideration to the Trust by transferring the shares of stock. In such case, the transfer of the aircraft to the

Ms. S--- S---

-3-

March 28, 1991
105.0131

commencing corporation solely in exchange for the first issue stock is a nontaxable transfer. Neither sales tax nor use tax applies to the transfer. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace