Was a separately stated copywriting charge nontaxable when an agency contracted to provide both the mechanical and placement of the media advertising?

Short answer Yes. The memorandum treated copy written for media advertising as nontaxable when the agency also contracted to place the ad and separately stated the writing charge from taxable charges.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 100.0310
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1987-03-27
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
San Francisco auditing staff reviewing an advertising agency (taxpayer identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Legal memorandum dated March 27, 1987, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. The same memorandum is separately published for Annotation 100.0320, which emphasizes taxable copy incorporated into a mechanical sold without media placement. Page two carries an apparent legacy June 5, 1970 footer that conflicts with the memorandum's 1987 header. Another taxpayer should not treat this staff memorandum as binding and should check current copywriting, media-placement, mechanical-art, and separately-stated-charge rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An advertising agency separately billed for copywriting and for a mechanical that incorporated the copy. The legal memorandum explained when media-related writing could be excluded from the mechanical's taxable price.

Charges for copy written solely for television, radio, newspaper, or other media advertising messages were nontaxable under the stated position. The same applied when copy served more than one purpose and one purpose was a media advertising message.

Those writing charges had to be separately stated from taxable charges. If the agency contracted to provide both the mechanical and placement of the advertising, its separately stated copywriting charge could be excluded from taxable gross receipts.

The opposite applied when the agency sold only the mechanical. In that situation, the copywriting was part of tangible property sold by the agency, and the client's later delivery of the mechanical to the media did not make the charge nontaxable.

What this means for you

Advertising agencies

The contract should clearly identify both media placement and copywriting, and the invoice should separately state the writing charge from taxable mechanical charges.

Media buyers and marketers

The memorandum distinguished an agency hired to place advertising from a vendor that merely sells a finished mechanical.

Accountants and tax professionals

Verify both contractual scope and invoicing. The nontaxable branch required media-related copy and a separately stated charge.

Common questions

Q: Did the rule cover television, radio, and newspaper copy?

A: Yes. The memorandum named those as examples of media advertising messages.

Q: Could multipurpose copy qualify?

A: Yes, when one of its purposes was media advertising, under the position described.

Q: Was separate statement required?

A: Yes. The copywriting charge had to be separately stated from taxable charges.

Q: What if the agency did not provide media placement?

A: Then copy incorporated into the sold mechanical was taxable under the memorandum's other branch.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540(b)(4)(E)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

San Francisco Auditing (AAV)

100.0310

Date:

March 27, 1987
4/1/87

From:

Legal (RLD)

Subject:

C--- Inc.
SR -- XX-XXXXXX

D. Cady
D. Chan
A. De Agero
B. Jones
E. Trites
--- Library
New Material Folder

This is in reply to your February 9, 1987 memorandum regarding the application of tax to charges for copy writing by C--- Inc., an advertising agency which is also the retailer of graphic arts. Specifically, you asked whether charges for copy writing are taxable when the copy is incorporated into a mechanical which is used in media advertising. The charge for the copy writing and the charge for the mechanical are separately stated on the taxpayer’s sales invoices. As you know, Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540 provides at subdivision (b)(4)(E): “Effective January 1, 1975, tax applies to charges for writing copy written solely for use as a part of tangible personal property as to which the agency is acting as a seller. Tax does not apply to such charges in other circumstances or when the agency is acting as agent. “Tax does not apply where copy is furnished to media in manuscript form.” We have taken the position that, if an agency only sells a mechanical to a client and does not contract to furnish the media advertising, the taxable gross receipts of the sale of the mechanical include the charge for the copy writing. In such case, the agency’s charge is for “copy written solely for use as a part of tangible personal property as to which the agency is acting as a seller.” (Reg. 1540, subd. (b)(4)(E), supra.) The client’s furnishing the mechanical to the media does not make the charge for the copy nontaxable. On the other hand, as noted in Tax Counsel Donald J. Hennessy’s July 21, 1981 letter to Mr. P--- J---, charges for copy written solely for media (television, radio, newspaper, etc.)

San Francisco Auditing (AAV)

-2-

June 5, 1970
100.0310

advertising messages or for more than one purpose, one of which is for media advertising messages, are not taxable. Such charges must be separately stated from taxable charges. Therefore, if the agency contracts to furnish the client with both the mechanical and the placement of the advertising, the agency’s separately stated charge for writing the copy is excludable from the gross receipts of the sale of the mechanical. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again.

RLD:sr

100.0310.doc

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1987. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace