Back to Federal guidance

FMLA complaint and employer bankruptcy

Summary A complainant asked WHD to revisit an FMLA termination complaint after the employer filed for bankruptcy. WHD said it could bring an enforcement action and seek appropriate injunctive relief despite the bankruptcy stay, but monetary recovery would require a claim in bankruptcy court. It sent the new evidence to its regional office for review without deciding the underlying complaint.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FMLA2003-3-A
Date issued
July 24, 2003
Status
Active
Status last verified October 8, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

July 24, 2003 FMLA2003-3-A

Dear Name*,

This is in response to your letter dated June 4, 2003, addressed to the Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao and Tammy D. McCutchen, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, regarding the handling of your complaint under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) against Name* by the Wage and Hour Division District Office (DO) in Kansas City, Kansas. A member of my staff has spoken with you on several occasions regarding your concerns.

The Kansas City DO conducted an investigation of your complaint beginning in June 2002, and could not substantiate that you where terminated in violation of the FMLA. The outcome of that investigation was reviewed by the Midwest Regional Office (RO) in Chicago, Illinois, which has authority to review the enforcement actions of the Kansas City DO. The Midwest RO concluded that the DO acted in accordance with established policies and procedures. Subsequently, you contacted a member of the FMLA Team in Washington, D.C., office of the Wage and Hour Division (the Division) to discuss your concerns.

You enclosed additional documents with your June 4th letter which you contend support that you were terminated from your employment in violation of the FMLA. You also contend that the U. S. Department of Labor is not subject to the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. 362(a)) and, therefore, is able to recover money you believe is due to you from Name since your termination on May 30, 2002. You advised us that Name filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 31, 2002.

In our view, the police and regulatory power exception to the automatic stay provision of the bankruptcy code would allow the Department of Labor to bring an action under the FMLA in district court while an employer is in bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. 362(b)(4). Injunctive relief could be obtained in such an action, which in the proper circumstances may allow reinstatement to a complainant’s prior position. However, the Department cannot collect back wages or other monetary relief from an employer in bankruptcy as a result of that action. A proof of claim would have to be filed in bankruptcy court in order to obtain monetary relief. That claim would be subject to the priorities and rules of the bankruptcy court.

We are forwarding your letter with its enclosures to our Midwest RO. The Midwest RO will review the additional documentation you provided and determine if this new information is sufficient to support directing the Kansas City DO to complete additional fact-finding in your case. Someone from the RO will contact you directly to advise you of the outcome of their review, and to discuss the bankruptcy as it relates to your case. You may contact the RO directly at (312) 596-7204. In addition, you may independently file a proof of claim with the bankruptcy court.

Sincerely,

Tammy D. McCutchen Administrator

cc: Midwest Regional Office

Note: * The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(7).

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace