Back to Federal guidance

Original FMLA effective date under railway CBAs

Summary WHD explained the FMLA's original effective date for employees under a collective bargaining agreement subject to the Railway Labor Act. It said coverage began when the agreement was first reopened for negotiations after August 5, 1993, or on February 5, 1994, whichever came first. Negotiations did not have to address FMLA for that date to apply.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FMLA-39
Date issued
July 21, 1994
Status
Active
Status last verified October 12, 2026
Topics

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

July 21, 1994
FMLA-39

Dear Name*,

This is in response to your inquiry regarding the effective date of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA). In designating the effective date, which is generally August 5, 1993 for all employees not subject to the terms of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), Congress expressly delayed the effective date for employers who had a CBA in effect on August 5, 1993.

The effective date of the FMLA for CBAs subject to the Railway Labor Act is the first date after August 5, 1993 that the contract is reopened for negotiations, or February 5, 1994, whichever occurs first. The fact that the CBA is opened for negotiations, and negotiations for implementation of FMLA is not included, is immaterial; FMLA becomes effective for the employees covered by the CBA on the date negotiations are reopened. Congress delayed the effective date of the FMLA to give employers and union representatives an opportunity to negotiate the implementation of the statute. There is no requirement that such negotiation take place.

Hopefully this has been responsive to your inquiry. If we may be of further assistance please let us know.

Sincerely,

J. Dean Speer Director, Division of Policy and Analysis

cc: FMLA Coordinator

  • Note: The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(7).

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace