Back to Federal guidance

Multi-employer health plan after a winter layoff

Summary WHD considered a construction employer that closed a site and laid off all workers while one worker was on FMLA leave. It said contributions to a multi-employer health plan could stop if the employer showed that the worker would not otherwise have remained employed by it or another plan member. If workers moved to another site and the employee on leave would have moved too, contributions had to continue.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FMLA-14
Date issued
November 3, 1993
Status
Active
Status last verified October 12, 2026
Topics

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

November 3, 1993
FMLA-14

Dear Name*,

During a recent meeting in which the provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) was discussed, a question was posed regarding the obligation of an employer whose employees are covered by a multi-employer benefit plan to maintain group health insurance during a period of unpaid leave. The question arose in the context that the employer had ceased all operations on a particular construction project for the winter and all employees had been laid off. This action takes place during a period when an employee is on unpaid FMLA leave.

The FMLA generally provides that an employer must maintain group health insurance for an employee taking FMLA leave in the same manner and at the same level as was provided on the date leave commences. During the discussions in Congress leading up to the passage of the FMLA, congress specifically addressed the special circumstances relating to employees covered by a multi-employer plan, as reflected in the legislative history.

An employer whose employees are provided benefits through the operation of a multi-employer plan must continue to make contributions during FMLA leave unless the employer demonstrates that the employee would not otherwise have been employed. Coverage by the health plan must continue at the level coverage would have been continued if the employee continued to be employed, unless it is demonstrated that the employee would not otherwise have been employed by the employer or any other member employer of the plan. An employer is otherwise relieved of making contributions to the plan on behalf of an employee taking unpaid FMLA leave if the plan expressly provides for some other method of maintaining coverage for a period of leave required by the FMLA.

In direct response to the question, if the employer whose employees receive benefits pursuant to a multi-employer plan ceases activity and all employees on that job are laid off the employer may discontinue contributions on behalf of an employee taking unpaid FMLA leave if the employer can demonstrate the employee would not have continued to be employed by either the employer or another employer who is a member of the same plan.

Of course, if the employer closes one construction site, lays off all employees, but moves those employees to another site to continue employment, the employer must continue to make contributions on behalf of the employee taking FMLA leave as it is reasonable to assume the employee would have continued employment at the alternate site as well.

Hopefully this has been responsive to the question. If further assistance is needed please contact me at telephone 219-8412.

Sincerely,

J. DEAN SPEER Director, Division of Policy and Analysis

  • Note: The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(7).

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace