Back to Federal guidance

Effect of 2004 overtime rules on a national service opinion

Summary A requester asked whether the 2004 federal overtime regulation changed a 1998 WHD opinion about National and Community Service Act participants. WHD said the relevant statutory provision had not changed and the new regulation did not address that Act, so its earlier opinion remained its position. This short letter does not restate the 1998 opinion’s underlying analysis.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FLSA2005-4
Date issued
January 7, 2005
Status
Active
Status last verified October 8, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

January 7, 2005
FLSA2005-4

Dear Name*,

This is in response to your letter inquiring as to whether the recent changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations had any impact on a previous opinion letter dated November 18, 1998 (copy attached) addressing the applicability of the FLSA to Name* participants. That letter relied on a statutory provision in the National and Community Service Act. That provision has not been changed and nothing in the updated overtime security regulation relates to that Act. Accordingly, the prior opinion letter continues to reflect our opinion.

This opinion is based exclusively on the facts and circumstances described in your request and is given on the basis if your representation, explicit or implied, that you have provided a full and fair description of all the facts and circumstances which would be pertinent to our consideration of the questions presented. Existence of any other factual or historical background not contained in your request might require a different conclusion than the one expressed herein. You have represented that this opinion is not sought in connection with an investigation or litigation between a client or firm and the Wage and Hour Division or the Department of Labor.

We trust that the above is responsive to your inquiry.

Sincerely,

Alfred B. Robinson, Jr.
Acting Administrator

Note: * The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace