Back to Federal guidance

2005 policy on third-party companionship exemption

Summary A requester asked whether a court decision had changed WHD’s policy for third-party employers of companionship workers. WHD said in 2005 that its policy still allowed the exemption outside the Second Circuit. Current WHD guidance says third-party employers cannot claim the companionship exemption, so this historical answer conflicts with later agency guidance.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FLSA2005-12
Date issued
March 17, 2005
Status
Unknown
WHD Fact Sheet #79A (https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/79a-flsa-companionship) says that, under regulations effective January 1, 2015, third-party employers may not claim the companionship services exemption. This conflicts with this letter's conclusion. WHD's opinion index does not mark the letter withdrawn.
Status last verified October 8, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
WHD Fact Sheet #79A (https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/79a-flsa-companionship) says that, under regulations effective January 1, 2015, third-party employers may not claim the companionship services exemption. This conflicts with this letter's conclusion. WHD's opinion index does not mark the letter withdrawn. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

March 17, 2005
FLSA2005-12

Dear Name*,

This is in response to your letter inquiring as to the status of the Wage and Hour Division’s policy regarding the companionship services exemption contained in section 13(a)(15) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and interpreted in 29 CFR 552.109(a). The Division has not changed this regulation or its interpretation thereof as a result of the circuit court’s opinion in Coke v Long Island Care at Home, 376 F.3d 118 (2nd Cir. 2004). Therefore, it is still our opinion that employees engaged in companionship services, as defined in 29 CFR 552.6, who are employed by a third party are exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the FLSA, and you may continue to rely on the August 16, 2002 Opinion Letter signed by former Administrator Tammy McCutchen (copy enclosed) for practices outside states within the jurisdiction of the Second Circuit. Of course, we will monitor any case law that addresses this issue in other courts, and may reconsider our interpretation if case law so requires.

We trust that the above is responsive to your inquiry.

Sincerely,

Alfred B. Robinson, Jr.
Deputy Administrator

Enclosure

Note: * The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace