Back to Federal guidance

Nurse overtime agreements under section 7(b)

Summary A union representing nurses asked whether certification by a Nevada labor board was enough to negotiate a special overtime agreement under FLSA section 7(b). WHD said the section specifically required certification by the National Labor Relations Board, with no exception for state certification. It explained that obtaining NLRB certification for this purpose could be a relatively routine process.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FLSA2004-9
Date issued
September 9, 2004
Status
Active
Status last verified October 8, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

September 9, 2004
FLSA2004-9

Dear Name*,

This is in response to your letter to Ms. Susan Nern of the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) in Phoenix, Arizona regarding the payment of overtime to nurses at the Name of Name. Your letter was forwarded to this office for a reply.

You state that your union, the Name, represents approximately 1300 nurses at Name and you have been considering how the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) might be applied to them. You state that Section 7(j) is not feasible, and that you would prefer the implementation of an agreement under either Section 7(b)(1) or 7(b)(2) of the FLSA instead.

As you know, Sections 7(b)(1) and 7(b)(2) contain requirements concerning the number of overtime hours that may be worked and, also, both sections require that the overtime agreement may be reached only as the result of collective bargaining by employee representatives certified as bona fide by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Your concern is that, although you are the bona fide representatives for Name employees, you are not certified by the NLRB. Instead, you are certified by the Local Government Employee-Management Relations Board, a board that you describe as “essentially the state equivalent” of the NLRB. You explain that because Name is considered a local governmental body, you are subject to the State collective bargaining statute (Nevada Revised Statutes 288.010 et seq.). You enclose a copy of a case by the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada which mentions that the state’s Employee-Management Relations Board was patterned after the NLRB and you ask whether it would be acceptable to implement a Section 7(b) agreement under the auspices of a bargaining agent certified by a state rather than the NLRB.

Section 7(b) requires certification of the collective bargaining representative by the NLRB. No exception has been provided which would allow a Section 7(b) agreement negotiated by a bargaining agent certified by the State of Nevada, rather than the NLRB. The FLSA does not, however, require use of the Board’s procedures for certification of the union as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees within a particular bargaining unit for the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act. Certification by the NLRB for the purposes of section 7(b) can be a relatively routine matter, initiated by a letter of request. Enclosure of evidence that your union is certified by the Employee-Management Relations Board might facilitate certification by the NLRB.

This opinion is based exclusively on the facts and circumstances described in your request and is given on the basis of your representation, explicit or implied, that you have provided a full and fair description of all the facts and circumstances which would be pertinent to our consideration of the question presented. Existence of any other factual or historical background not contained in your request might require a different conclusion than the one expressed herein. You have also represented that this opinion is not sought by a party to pending litigation concerning the issue addressed herein. You have also represented that this opinion is not sought in connection with an investigation or litigation between a client or firm and the Wage and Hour Division or the Department of Labor.

We trust that the above information is responsive to your inquiry.

Sincerely,

Alfred B. Robinson, Jr.,
Acting Administrator

Note: * The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace