Back to Federal guidance

Restaurant clothing requirements and uniforms

Summary A restaurant asked whether prescribed khaki bottoms and navy golf shirts were uniforms and whether employees had to be reimbursed. WHD viewed the ordinary, wearable street clothing as not a uniform on the stated facts. It said the restaurant could require the clothing without reimbursing its cost.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD)
Document number
FLSA2004-1NA
Date issued
March 30, 2004
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division (WHD). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
Wage and Hour Division
Washington, D.C. 20210

March 30, 2004
FLSA2004-1NA

Dear Name*,

This is in response to your June 29, 2000 letter requesting a Wage and Hour opinion relating to a restaurant chain’s clothing requirements for its employees. We regret the delay in responding to your letter.

You asked whether work garments that the employer requires most of its employees to wear while on duty are uniforms, and whether the employer may require the employees to purchase such garments even if the cost would effectively initially reduce the wages below the minimum wage.

You described that employees are required to wear a navy blue, short sleeve, pullover, collared shirt sometimes referred to as a polo shirt or golf shirt. The shirts do not bear any logo and can be worn outside work. Employees are also required to wear either khaki colored shorts or khaki colored trousers, but neither with cargo pockets. The shorts or trousers do not bear any logo and can be worn outside work.

Whether certain types of dress that an employer requires employees to wear to work are considered uniforms for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a question of fact to be decided in the context of a given case. Although there are no hard-and-fast rules, the following principles are applicable. If an employer merely prescribes a general type of ordinary basic street clothing to be worn while working and permits variations in details of dress, the garments chosen by the employees would not be considered to be uniforms. On the other hand, where the employer does prescribe a specific type and style of clothing to be worn at work, e.g. where a restaurant or hotel requires a tuxedo or a skirt and blouse or jacket of a specific or distinctive style, color, and quality, such clothing would be considered uniforms. Based on the information provided in your letter, we are inclined to view the khaki shorts or trousers, and navy blue golf shirts required of the employees as ordinary basic street clothing and not a uniform under the FLSA. Accordingly, the restaurant may require the employees to wear such garments to work without reimbursing the employees for the cost.

Wage and Hour has published guidelines for employers regarding minimum wage issues that arise when employees are required to wear uniforms in Fact Sheet No 016. The Fact Sheet is reproduced in its entirety at http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs16.htm, and we are attaching a copy for your reference.

This opinion is based exclusively on the facts and circumstances described in your request and is given on the basis of your representation, explicit or implied, that you have provided a full and fair description of all the facts and circumstances that would be pertinent to our consideration of the questions presented. Existence of any other factual or historical background not contained in your request might require a different conclusion than the one expressed in this letter.

We trust that the above information is responsive to your inquiry.

Sincerely,

Barbara R. Relerford Office of Enforcement Policy Fair Labor Standards Team

Note: * The actual name(s) was removed to preserve privacy.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace