Back to Federal guidance

Masonry-wall homes under OSHA's residential-construction directive

Summary A home builder asked whether houses with masonry walls and wood roof trusses fell within OSHA's residential-construction fall-protection directive. OSHA said the directive was written for residential stick-frame construction and did not apply to the masonry-wall structures described, although other residential-construction rules and a written alternative fall-protection plan could apply. OSHA now labels the letter an archive document and cautions that it may no longer represent agency policy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
2004-05-17
Date issued
May 17, 2004
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA archive notice: "This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content for research and review purposes only." The letter applies residential fall-protection directive STD 03-00-001.
Status last verified October 8, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA archive notice: "This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content for research and review purposes only." The letter applies residential fall-protection directive STD 03-00-001. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

May 17, 2004

Mr. Laurence Guilbault

Corporate Safety Director

Dooleymack Constructors, Inc.

[Recipient address omitted]

Re: Whether dwelling structures, such as single-family and townhouses, constructed with masonry walls (instead of stick-framing) and wood roof trusses, fall within OSHA's STD 03-00-001 [formerly STD 3-0.1A]?

Dear Mr. Guilbault:

This is in response to your letter dated April 19, 2004, to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). You ask whether dwelling structures constructed with masonry walls (instead of stick-framing) and wood roof trusses, fall within OSHA's STD 03-00-001 [formerly STD 3-0.1A]. Your letter was forwarded to this office for handling on April 29, 2004.

We have paraphrased your question as follows:

Question: The majority of single-family and townhouses in Florida are constructed with masonry walls (rather than stick-framing) and wood roof trusses. Does this construction fall within the scope of STD 3-0.1A?

Answer

No. STD 3-0.1A, the plain language rewrite of STD 3-1, defines "residential construction":

For purposes of this instruction, an employer is engaged in residential construction where the working environment, materials, methods and procedures are essentially the same as those used in building a typical single-family home or townhouse.

Residential construction is characterized by:

Materials: Wood framing (not steel or concrete); wooden floor joists and roof structures.

Methods: Traditional wood-frame construction techniques.

[Emphasis added.]


In sum, for the purpose of STD 3-0.1A, residential construction is not determined by the structure's ultimate use (commercial vs. residential); rather, residential construction is characterized by the working environment, methods, materials, and procedures used. Where those elements are the same as those used in typical stick-frame home construction, the directive's test for residential construction is met and STD 3-0.1A applies.

STD 3-0.1A was narrowly drafted to address the specific feasibility problems associated with residential stick-built framing. Specifically, the industry noted the inadequacy of stick-built framing for anchoring fall protection systems.

Given the above-noted directive language and its rationale, as we have previously stated in our June 30, 2003, Clark/Torres memorandum, STD 3-01.A does not apply to the residential construction that you describe. The compliance directive specifically references stick-built framing construction; thus, construction of a residential structure with masonry walls instead of stick-built walls (even if it has wood roof trusses) is beyond its scope. In addition, the information that we currently have indicates that there are a number of ways to prevent fall exposure during the construction of the structures that you describe.

Keep in mind that where a structure is not considered "residential construction" for purposes of STD 3-0.1A, it may nonetheless be considered "residential construction" for purposes of §1926.501(b)(13). Under that provision, an employer constructing a house with masonry walls may use alternative fall protection methods where it can demonstrate the infeasibility of conventional fall protection. The alternative procedures must be in a written, site-specific plan that complies with the criteria in §1926.502(k). If an employer is engaged in residential construction and wants to use a plan under §1926.502(k), it may base its plan on the sample residential fall protection plan in Appendix E for work under 48 feet. The plan must be in writing, be tailored to the worksite, and conform to the other 1926.502(k) requirements. It can be used only if the employer can demonstrate that conventional fall protection is infeasible or a greater hazard at the site in question. The Appendix E plan is not assumed to be sufficient under §1926.502(k) when this work is performed at or above 48 feet.

If you need additional information, please contact us by fax at: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA, Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards and Guidance, fax # 202-693-1689. You can also contact us by mail at the above office, Room N3468, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, although there will be a delay in our receiving correspondence by mail.

Sincerely,

Russell B. Swanson, Director

Directorate of Construction

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace