Back to Federal guidance

Respirator fit testing after tuberculosis rule rescission

Summary A medical center asked how often workers using respirators against tuberculosis and other infectious diseases need fit testing. OSHA said its tuberculosis-specific respiratory rule had been rescinded and the general rule now applies. That rule requires initial and at least annual fit testing, plus new tests when respirator or facial changes could affect fit.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
2004-02-05
Date issued
February 5, 2004
Status
Active
Status last verified October 8, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

February 5, 2004

Ms. Bernice B. Friedman

Chief, Infection Control Service

Department of the Army

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Washington, DC 20307-5001

Dear Ms. Friedman:

Thank you for your letter of November 6, 2003 concerning the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation on Respiratory Protection for M. tuberculosis, 29 CFR 1910.139. Specifically, you asked how often a health care facility must perform fit testing for employees who must wear a respirator for protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), SARS, Smallpox and Monkeypox. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation only of the requirements discussed and may not be applicable to any question not delineated within your original correspondence.

In your letter, you mentioned a previous letter we had written regarding our enforcement policy for the Respiratory Protection for M. tuberculosis standard, 1910.139. That letter, as well as others, that refer to 1910.139 have recently been removed from our website as they no longer express OSHA policy. OSHA withdrew the proposed standard for Occupational Exposure to M. Tuberculosis on December 31, 2003 (Federal Register, Vol. 68, No. 250, P. 75768). At the same time, the temporary standard for Respiratory Protection for M. Tuberculosis, 1910.139 was also rescinded [Federal Register, Vol. 68, No. 250, P. 75776-75780]. Employers are now required to follow the same respiratory protection standard that is used for all other substances, 29 CFR 1910.134. Respiratory protection for the other diseases you mentioned has always been covered under 1910.134.

Under 1910.134, fit testing must be performed initially (before the employee is required to wear the respirator in the workplace) and must be repeated at least annually. Fit testing must also be conducted whenever respirator design or facial changes occur that could affect the proper fit of the respirator. Examples of conditions which would require additional fit testing of an employee include (but are not limited to) the use of a different size or make of respirator, weight loss, cosmetic surgery, facial scarring, the installation of dentures or absence of dentures that are normally worn by the individual.

Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this information helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our interpretation letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed. Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult OSHA's website at http://www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Health Enforcement at (202) 693-2190.

Sincerely,

Richard E. Fairfax, Director

Directorate of Enforcement Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace