Back to Federal guidance

Scaffold stairs used as access to multistory buildings

Summary A safety consultant challenged OSHA’s position on scaffold stair towers serving building levels. OSHA said a tower meeting the scaffold subpart, even if it differed from stairway requirements, could be treated as de minimis when it provided equivalent protection. OSHA said such deviations would not be cited.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
2000-08-22
Date issued
August 22, 2000
Status
Active
OSHA marked the letter corrected on June 2, 2005.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

August 22, 2000

Mr. J. Robert Harrell

President

Safety Management Services

[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mr. Harrell:

This is in response to your letters dated February 29 and April 17, 2000, to OSHA's Directorate of Construction. I apologize for the delay in providing this response.

In your February 29 letter, you take issue with our policy regarding the use of scaffold stairs that comply with Subpart L, but do not comply with Subpart X, for access to a multi-story structure. We explained our policy in a letter dated February 23, 2000 to Mr. Gary Larson.

The last paragraph of our letter to Mr. Larson reads,

"While the provisions of Subpart X do apply to scaffold stairs used for such access, the use of scaffold stair towers as a means of access between levels of a multistory structure would be a de minimis violation where the scaffold stair tower system is designed, erected and maintained in full compliance with Subpart L. De minimis violations of standards exist when an employer complies with the clear intent of the standard but deviates from its particular requirements in a manner that has no direct or immediate impact on the safety and health of workers. OSHA does not impose penalties or require correction of de minimis violations."

In the near future, we plan to issue an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in which we will ask the public for information on several Subpart L issues. After the public responds, we will consider the information submitted and determine if it would be appropriate to propose any changes to Subpart L. At that point we will consider your remarks on the Subpart X/Subpart L issue and determine if any changes to the standard regarding this issue should be proposed.

In your April 17 letter, you ask the following: if OSHA issues a de minimis citation to an employer on one occasion, and then finds the same violation on a subsequent occasion, how would the second instance be treated — would it be considered de minimis, Serious, Repeat, or Willful?

OSHA does not issue citations where the violation is considered de minimis. Consequently, neither the first instance nor subsequent instances of de minimis violations would be cited.

If you need additional information, please contact us by fax at: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA, Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards and Guidance, fax # 202-693-1689. You can also contact us by mail at the above office, Room N3468, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, although there will be a delay in our receiving correspondence by mail.

Sincerely,

Russell B. Swanson, Director

Directorate of Construction

[Corrected 6/2/2005]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace