Back to Federal guidance

Former residential fall-protection directive and construction materials

Summary A residential safety consultant asked whether OSHA had changed the definition of residential construction in its rewritten fall-protection directive. OSHA said it had not and explained that isolated nonwood components did not necessarily exclude a house. OSHA now labels this letter archival, so the described directive policy is historical.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
2000-08-10
Date issued
August 10, 2000
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this letter an archive document that may no longer represent OSHA policy; it discusses former residential directive STD 3-0.1A.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this letter an archive document that may no longer represent OSHA policy; it discusses former residential directive STD 3-0.1A. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

OSHA archive notice: "This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only."

August 10, 2000

Mrs. Regina McMichael

AURUS Safety Management, Inc.

[Recipient address omitted]

Dear Mrs. McMichael:

This is in response to your letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regarding OSHA's interim fall protection enforcement policy for residential construction. You express a concern that in our plain language re-write of the policy we actually changed the definition of residential construction and revised the height restrictions.

As you know, on December 8, 1995, OSHA published STD 3.1, an interim fall protection compliance policy for certain residential construction activities. On June 18, 1999, OSHA published [STD 03-00-001 (formerly STD 3-0.1A)], a plain language rewrite of this policy. The definition of residential construction remains unchanged and continues to include structures where the working environment, materials, methods and procedures are essentially the same as those used in building a typical single-family home or townhouse.

To help clarify the policy, we added examples of building materials ("wood framing [not steel or concrete]; wooden floor joists and roof structures") and methods in the re-write. Typical single family homes are constructed with wood framing. However, the use of a single steel I-beam in the main floor structure, poured concrete (or cinder block) foundation walls, a stucco exterior, or metal stud framing instead of wood stud framing would not exclude a home from the scope of STD 3-0.1A.

STD 3-0.1A limits the structure's height "to three and a half stories or 48 feet (including the basement, two finished levels, attic). The 48-foot measure is from the base of the building, at the lowest ground level (including any excavation), to the point of greatest height." You ask if that excludes buildings that are less than 48 feet high but have more that 3½ stories. The answer is no — as in Appendix E, as long as they are no more than 48 feet high (and otherwise meet the definition) they would be considered residential construction.

If you need additional information, please contact us by fax at: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA, Directorate of Construction, Office of Construction Standards and Guidance, fax # 202-693-1689. You can also contact us by mail at the above office, Room N3468, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210, although there will be a delay in our receiving correspondence by mail.

Sincerely,

Russell B. Swanson, Director

Directorate of Construction

[Corrected 6/2/2005]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace