Back to Federal guidance

Recording abnormal heavy-metal test results

Summary An OSHA regional official asked whether elevated heavy-metal test results without symptoms were recordable. OSHA said the facts were insufficient by themselves; an abnormal test result was work-related when workplace exposure caused or contributed to it. The letter said abnormal nickel or cobalt levels linked to work should be recorded, but OSHA now marks this guidance archival.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1998-08-26
Date issued
August 26, 1998
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this letter an archive document that may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this letter an archive document that may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

August 26, 1998

Mr. Jerry D. Bailey
Assistant Regional Administrator
US DOL/OSHA
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Bailey:

This is in response to your FAX of July 15, 1998 requesting an injury and illness recordkeeping interpretation of a scenario in which employees tested with the presence of heavy metals, such as the inorganic minerals nickel and cobalt, in their blood, but exhibited no symptoms of illness at the time of testing.

The scenario that you present is too vague and lacking in detail for recordability. If there is no link to work, do not record the symptoms. Since the employees cannot determine when the symptoms presented themselves or whether the symptoms were due to occupational exposure, they cannot be considered to be work related and are therefore not recordable.

Tests performed during a routine or event induced medical examination which result in values outside the range of normality indicate an abnormal condition. This abnormal condition is considered work related for OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping purposes if an event or exposure in the workplace either caused or contributed to the abnormal condition. If the tests show abnormal levels of nickel or cobalt in the employees' blood or urine, the case should be recorded as an occupational illness (See similar case concerning detectable levels of chemicals in the blood in 07/30/98 letter to Kenneth W. Gerecke).

I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact the Division of Recordkeeping Requirements, at Area Code: (202) 219-6463.

Sincerely,

Ruth McCully
Acting Information Technology Coordinator

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace