Back to Federal guidance

Remote water-treatment plant exemption from process safety management

Summary An Alaska safety official described an unstaffed water-treatment site with chlorine cylinders, remote alarms and brief routine worker visits. OSHA said the described site qualified as a normally unoccupied remote facility under the process safety management exemption. The answer depended on that specific operating pattern.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1998-05-29-0
Date issued
May 29, 1998
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

May 29, 1998

Mr. Tim Bundy
State of Alaska DOL/OSHA
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Bundy:

This is in response to your December 2, 1997 letter requesting interpretation of the Process Safety Management (PSM) Standard, 29 CFR 1910.119. Please accept our apology for the delay in responding. Your scenario and question and our reply follow:

Scenario: The following water treatment plant consists of two 2 million gallon water tanks, a valve/instrument house, and a chlorine building. No workers are stationed at this site. Workers are dispatched from the waste water treatment facility which is about 4 miles away from the water treatment plant. They spend an average of 1.5 man hours per day checking the water treatment plant; an additional 2.5 man hours once a week; and an additional 6.5 hours once a month at the plant.

The chlorine building was built in 1995 and consists of a cylinder room, a scrubber room, an emergency generator room, and a utility/storage room. The cylinder room is equipped with monitors that activate remote alarms and a ventilation system which ducts chlorine gas to the adjoining scrubber tank, which neutralizes the gas. The scrubber system is sized to capture and neutralize a full cylinder. One ton chlorine cylinders are used at the water treatment plant. The cylinder room would remain under negative pressure in the event of a chlorine leak.

There are no conveniences for a permanent presence at this site, such as vending machines or bathroom facilities.

Question: Based on this description, would this site be considered a normally unoccupied remote facility under the PSM regulation?

Reply: The water treatment plant described in the scenario above would be considered a normally unoccupied remote facility which would be excepted from PSM Standard coverage as provided under paragraph 1910.119(a)(2).

We appreciate your interest in employee safety and health. If we can be of further assistance, please contact the Office of Safety Compliance Assistance, Mr. Ronald J. Davies, telephone (202) 219-8031, extension 110.

Sincerely,
John B. Miles, Jr., Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace