Back to Federal guidance

Back belts, lifting hazards and worker safety complaints

Summary A worker proposed a back-belt safety campaign and described adverse reactions to safety complaints. OSHA said it preferred engineering and work-design controls for lifting hazards and had not found back belts proven to prevent workplace low-back injuries. It neither banned nor endorsed belts and pointed to anti-retaliation complaint channels.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1998-04-06
Date issued
April 6, 1998
Status
Active
OSHA's posted letter notes a correction on July 31, 2007.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 6, 1998
[Name Withheld]
Dear [Name Withheld]
This is in response to your correspondence dated October 9, 1997, to President Clinton proposing a safety campaign for back belts. Your letter to President Clinton was referred to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for our response. We apologize for the delay in responding.
OSHA's preferred approach to prevention of injuries and illnesses, including back injuries, is to eliminate the hazardous condition in the workplace, primarily through engineering controls. Engineering controls in situations involving lifting might include mechanical assists, adjustment of the height of the surface from which or to which material is lifted, or elimination of unnecessary bending or twisting in the task through workstation and equipment design.
When engineering controls are insufficient, administrative controls may be used. In the case of lifting, job redesign could be considered. Training of employees and their supervisors in proper lifting techniques is also important.
Back belts are not recognized by OSHA as effective engineering controls to prevent back injury. While they may be accepted by individual workers because they feel as if they provide additional support, the effectiveness of back belts in the prevention of low back injuries has not been proven in the work environment.
Thus, OSHA does not forbid the use of back belts and similar devices, nor does it endorse their use. We have included two NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) publications for your information that discuss the current state of knowledge on backbelts and the importance of the employer developing and instituting a comprehensive ergonomics program.
Your letter indicates you have experienced adverse reactions to your complaints about safety matters. OSHA has authority under Section 11(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act to investigate and take appropriate action when that occurs. Section 11(c) states "No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee . . . " because the employee has made a complaint. Furthermore, when an employee believes he has been discriminated against, the employee may file a complaint within thirty days alleging discrimination. Normally we recommend contacting the local OSHA Area Office for further information; however, your return address is Salinas, California.
The State of California is one of the twenty-five States that administer their own safety and health program, which are overseen and monitored by Federal OSHA. State plan standards must be at least as effective as Federal OSHA standards, and the State may choose to promulgate and enforce requirements which are stricter than Federal OSHA's. We recommend contacting the California State Plan regarding this issue. They may be reached at the following address and telephone number:

[California Department of Industrial Relations
455 Golden Gate Avenue, 10th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102
(415) 703-5050]

We hope you find the above information helpful. Your concern for employee safety and health is appreciated.
Sincerely,
John B. Miles, Jr, Director
Directorate of Enforcement Programs
[Corrected 7/31/2007]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace