Back to Federal guidance

Use of a nonapproved emergency respirator

Summary A power company asked OSHA to accept a nonapproved respirator for tactical emergency situations. OSHA said NIOSH approves respirators, and OSHA may consider a nonapproved component only in rare, well-tested circumstances with a demonstrated workplace need. The information supplied did not establish that the proposed device would adequately protect workers.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1997-10-22
Date issued
October 22, 1997
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

October 22, 1997

Michael A. Reandeau, Supervisor
Licensing Administration
Illinois Power Company
Clinton Power Station
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Reandeau;

This is in response to your August 7 letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requesting approval and acceptance of the Quickmask respirator manufactured by Fume Free, Inc. for use during "tactical situations". Your letter specifically seeks OSHA approval through a compliance Instruction dated March 30, 1984 that mentions a narrow set of conditions where OSHA might accept a product such as a cartridge or canister that is not approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

OSHA is not a respirator testing and approval agency. This responsibility belongs to NIOSH. OSHA depends heavily upon the expertise at NIOSH to evaluate respirators and their components. On rare occasions OSHA might accept a nonapproved component such as a specific cartridge or canister on an approved respirator after thorough testing and evaluation of the component indicate that workers would be adequately protected for the intended use of the respirator. In addition, the employer must demonstrate there is a strong unique need for the unapproved component in the workplace. OSHA would also require employers to conduct, air monitoring of the workers to determine the that the contaminant concentrations do not exceed the protection afforded by the respirator.

OSHA is very much concerned about workers using adequate protective equipment. Emergency use respirators are especially important to workers since they could be used under extreme conditions. The information in your request is not sufficient for us or for NIOSH to determine whether workers will be provided adequate protection when they are used. The design of the Quickmask is radically different than those presently approved by NIOSH. Since this device is so different, we advise you to continue to work with the NIOSH staff in Morgantown, West Virginia to develop evaluation criteria for its approval.

If you have any questions concerning this letter or if you want to discuss your request further, please feel free to contact Stephen Mallinger at (202) 219-8036 ext. 35.

Sincerely,

John B. Miles, Jr., Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

[Requester letter and accompanying correspondence reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace