Back to Federal guidance

Lockout and pressure-vessel rules for forging presses

Summary An OSHA region asked whether hydraulic forging presses could be cited under the general lockout rule as well as the press-specific rule. OSHA said both could apply. It also said the air-receiver rule covered vessels solely storing compressed air, but not hydraulic accumulators; OSHA marks the memo as archived and says it may no longer represent agency policy.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1997-04-23
Date issued
April 23, 1997
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and says it may no longer represent agency policy; the page does not state a withdrawal or replacement.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and says it may no longer represent agency policy; the page does not state a withdrawal or replacement. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

April 23, 1997

MEMORANDUM FOR: EMZELL BLANTON, JR.

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

FROM: JOHN B. MILES, JR., DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: Request for Compliance Assistance on High Profile Case

This is in response to the subject request of your February 4 memorandum to which was attached a copy of a February 3 memorandum to you from your Houston North Area Office. We apologize [for] the delay in our response. You requested that we provide answers to the following two questions posed in the memorandum from the Houston North Area Office. Our replies follow.

Question 1: The inspected equipment falls under paragraph 1910.218(f), covering forging presses. Paragraph 1910.218(f)(2) requires lockout/tagout. If the employer is deficient in elements of the requirements for LO/TO, can the applicable sections of 1910.147 be cited as well (i.e., training, verification, application of locks, etc.)?

Reply: OSHA intended that pre-existing standards, including paragraph 1910.218(f)(2), that require specific types of machines to be locked out, would be supplemented and not replaced by 1910.147. Section 1910.147 therefore also applies and can be also cited as to hydraulic forging presses which are covered under paragraph 1910.218(f)(2). This is discussed in the preamble, pages 36664 and 36665 of the Lockout/Tagout Final Rule.

Question 2: Does 1910.169 which covers "Air receivers", apply to pressure vessels used in conjunction with hydraulic forging presses?

Reply: Section 1910.169 applies to vessels, typically, air receivers, including those in a hydropneumatic forging press, dedicated solely to the storage of air under pressure. Section 1910.169 does not apply to the hydraulic accumulator(s) to which pneumatic pressure is applied or other hydraulic pressure vessels in the hydropneumatic forging press.

If we can be of further assistance, please contact the Office of Safety Compliance Assistance, Mr. Ronald J. Davies, telephone (202)219-8031, extension 110.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace