Back to Federal guidance

Protective clothing for aircraft firefighting

Summary OSHA corrected a Navy memo that claimed it had approved structural firefighting gear for aircraft crash response. OSHA said its earlier decision not to cite such use was tied to the absence of a consensus standard. After adoption of NFPA 1976, OSHA said that earlier memorandum was no longer valid and that agencies could be cited for failing to meet the newer aircraft firefighting equipment standard.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1997-04-03
Date issued
April 3, 1997
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 3, 1997
Mr. George W. Siebert
ODUSD (ES) SH
Department of Defense
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Siebert:
The attached memorandum from the Commander In Chief, United States Pacific Fleet, regarding a waiver on Aluminized Proximity Protective Clothing for Aircraft Firefighting, NAVAIR 00-80R-14 has come to our attention. This letter is to correct a misunderstanding and avoid further confusion on this area.
The memo states in paragraph 2 that "the OSHA position is that changes in design materials of structural firefighting clothing have resulted in state-of-the-art gear that provides equal or greater protection than that afforded by crash rescue suits and that OSHA has approved the use of structural protective clothing meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.156(e) (NFPA Standard 1971) for both structural and airport crash rescue firefighting."
This statement is misleading and the memorandum that the paragraph refers to was written as a specific response to a 1990 question from OSHA Region 3 regarding citations issued to the U.S. Army Transportation Command at Fort Eustis, Virginia and to the U.S. Navy at the Oceania Air Station. In that response, OSHA did not approve the use of structural gear for aircraft firefighting, OSHA stated that the employer would not be cited for using structural gear for aircraft crash response (copy of memo attached). The issue was stated that way at the time because no consensus standard existed that addressed aircraft crash and rescue protective equipment and OSHA had no basis to issue a general duty citation for failure to provide aluminized proximity protective clothing. In 1992, the National Fire Protection Association promulgated NFPA 1976 Standard on Protective Clothing for Proximity Firefighting which does address the issue and which requires aluminized proximity protective clothing for aircraft firefighting. Since there is now a consensus standard for aircraft firefighting, that earlier memorandum is no longer valid and an employer may be cited for failure to follow NFPA 1976.
Please advise DOD agencies and CINCPAC that any agency that fails to follow the equipment and other requirements of NFPA 1976 for aircraft firefighting will be subject to OSHA citation.
Should you have any further questions, [please contact 202-693-2122].
Thank you in advance for your quick action.
Sincerely,
John E. Plummer, Director
Office of Federal Agency Programs
[Corrected 1/17/03]

[Navy memorandum reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace