Back to Federal guidance

Inspection decisions after workplace violence fatalities

Summary A union official asked why OSHA did not automatically inspect every workplace violence death. OSHA said fatality investigations rank high in inspection priority, but area directors may make justified scheduling decisions and must determine whether a death resulted from work-related exposure. It described the policy as still developing in 1997.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1997-03-12
Date issued
March 12, 1997
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

March 12, 1997

Mr. Jordan Barab
Assistant Director
Health and Safety Department of Research
and Collective Bargaining Service
AFSCME
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Barab:

This is in response to your letter of January 22. You requested clarification of OSHA's investigative policy for occupational fatalities associated with violence. You also expressed concern that OSHA does not automatically inspect such workplace fatalities.

OSHA shares your concern about the increasing prevalence of workplace violence and has endeavored through the production of guidelines to address the problem. As you are aware, this is an emerging issue for OSHA and we are still in the process of making policy determinations with respect to enforcement. The prevailing policy with respect to determination of inspection scheduling is to allow the Area Directors of each area office to exercise their best judgment as to the effective use of OSHA resources. The Field Inspection Reference Manual (FIRM) which replaced the Field Operations Manual (FOM) in 1994 states: "Effective and efficient use of resources requires careful, flexible planning. In this way, the overall goal of hazard abatement and worker protection is best served." (OSHA Instruction CPL 2.103, p. I-3)

Fatality/catastrophe investigations are second only to imminent danger situations in the general order of priority for assignment of staff resources for inspection categories under the FIRM. Nevertheless, the FIRM specifically provides that deviations from this priority list are allowed so long as they are justifiable, lead to efficient use of resources, and contribute to the effective protection of workers. (OSHA Instruction CPL 2.103, p. I-4.)

I am attaching, for your information, a copy of (OSHA Instruction 2.113, Fatality Inspection Procedures. You will find in the definitions of fatalities and catastrophes, that they must result from a "work-related exposure." This is also a determination that the Area Director must make in deciding when to investigate workplace violence fatalities and catastrophes. Many do not fall within this definition.

I hope that this answers your questions related to the investigation of workplace violence fatalities. As I mentioned, we are still in the process of developing policy in this area and will keep you informed as to any decisions we make. Thank you for your interest in this important issue.

Sincerely,

John B. Miles, Jr.
Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace