Maximum gap between adjacent tank-runway guardrails
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
December 10, 1996
Mr. Jerome Spear, CSP
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Spear:
This is in response to your letter of November 26, regarding an interpretation of the 29 CFR 1910.23 standards relating to guardrails.
You indicated in your conversation with Art Buchanan, as well as in your letter, that two tanks are located adjacent to each other. A runway with standard guardrails is located on top of each tank with the end of the two runways butted to each other, but not connected (a drawing was attached). You also indicated that the two runways cannot be attached to each other because of the independent movement of the tanks that occurs during operation; however, engineering modification can be incorporated to minimize the gap between the two guardrails. Based on the information that you have provided, a maximum opening of four inches between the two guardrails would ensure compliance with 29 CFR 1910.23.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you need further assistance, please contact [the Office of General Industry Enforcement at (202) 693-1850].
Sincerely,
Raymond E. Donnelly, Director
[Directorate of Enforcement Programs]
[Corrected 6/2/2005]
[Requester letter reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace