Back to Federal guidance

Silver exposure variance request and control methods

Summary An employer sought a permanent variance from the silver metal exposure limit. OSHA declined to consider the request and explained that employers must use feasible engineering or administrative controls before relying on respirators for remaining exposure. The letter applied that standard to the employer's request.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1996-05-15-0
Date issued
May 15, 1996
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

May 15, 1996

Ms. Maureen S. Smith
Vice President, Human Resources
Yardney Technical Products, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Ms. Smith:

This letter is in response to your letter of April 8, 1996, addressed to Ms. Juanita Jones of my staff, requesting a permanent variance from the permissible exposure level for silver metal (29 CFR 1910.1000, Table Z-1 - Limits for Air Contaminants of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards). Based on the information you submitted, we have determined that it is inappropriate to entertain a variance from the standard and, therefore, no further action will be taken on your variance request. The rationale of the decision is explained below.

The OSHA air contaminants standard requires employers to maintain employee exposures to toxic air contaminants at or below permissible exposure limits with engineering or administrative controls, whenever feasible. If feasible engineering or administrative controls are not fully effective, then the remainder of the required protection must be obtained using personal respiratory protection devices as specified under 29 CFR 1910.134. Accordingly, the employer must demonstrate why it is infeasible to achieve compliance using engineering and administrative controls before using respirators.

Your affected employees must be informed of this standard clarification by posting this letter in all places where notices to employees are normally posted and, if applicable, giving a copy to the authorized employees' representative.

If you have any questions concerning your variance request, please contact Ms. Juanita Jones in the Office of Variance Determination at (202) 219-7193.

Sincerely,
Al Abadir
Acting Director
Office of Variance Determination

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace