Back to Federal guidance

Coordination with EPA during joint workplace investigations

Summary OSHA told regional administrators how to coordinate joint investigations with EPA while formal protocols were pending. It directed staff to keep EPA informed of enforcement case progress and agree at the outset which agency would obtain confidential business information. OSHA archives the memo as potentially outdated.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1996-04-29
Date issued
April 29, 1996
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

April 29, 1996

Memorandum for Regional Administrators

From: John B. Miles, Jr., Director Compliance Programs

Subject: Joint Investigations with EPA

We are reviewing proposed protocols for joint inspections with EPA, as you are aware. Your comments will be part of our review process. Until those protocols are completed, however, you need to be aware of two areas which require action in addition to our normal procedures.

  1. It is necessary to keep Regional EPA informed of the progress of our enforcement case, even if they have left the site. They should be aware of our plans for issuance of citations, for release of information (or non-release), and about litigation and/or settlement of the case.

  2. It is important that EPA understand our policies for obtaining and handling of confidential business information, and that we reach agreement with them at the start of each inspection as to what information will be required, and which agency will obtain it. As you are aware, consistent with the recent decision in the Shell case, our policy now is to obtain company documents which are required for our investigation by means of subpoena. If we, or EPA, were to obtain information on a voluntarily basis, that fact could compromise our ability to include it in published reports about the accident.

If you have questions or comments on this topic, please let me know, or contact Ray Donnelly on 202-219-8041, ext. 101, or by e-mail.

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace