Back to Federal guidance

Cranes near energized power lines

Summary A senator asked about OSHA rules after a fatal crane and power-line accident. OSHA said boom guards and insulating links did not substitute for keeping cranes clear of energized lines or using a clearance observer where required. OSHA archives the letter and warns it may no longer reflect current policy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1996-03-20
Date issued
March 20, 1996
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

March 20, 1996

The Honorable Robert C. Byrd
United States Senate
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Senator Byrd:

Thank you for your letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on behalf of [name withheld] concerning the unfortunate death of her son in a crane-related powerline accident.

Please be advised that Federal OSHA already regulates the operation of cranes near powerlines. A copy of the regulations is enclosed. As you can see, although the regulations recognize the availability of cage-type boom guards, insulating links, and other equipment intended for crane/powerline operations, the regulations do not recognize the use of such equipment as a substitute for keeping the crane away from energized powerlines, nor as a substitute for a clearance observer in those situations where the crane must be operated near energized powerlines.

As [name withheld] points out in her letter, Federal OSHA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) in October of 1992 to determine whether or not the existing standards have prevented OSHA from developing and issuing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). The public record for the project remains open, however, and [name withheld] comments have been forwarded to the Office of Construction Standards and Compliance Assistance for inclusion into that record. When it becomes possible to finish developing a new rule, [name withheld] comments will be fully considered.

As you may know, the State of Maryland is responsible for the enforcement of its own occupational safety and health standards under authority granted by Federal OSHA. Under such state plans, the regulations to be enforced must be at least as effective as federal standards. As [name withheld] son was working in Frederick, Maryland at the time of his death, she may wish to contact Maryland OSHA officials at (410) 333-4179.

Again, thank you for writing. Should you have any further questions, please contact Mr. Russell B. Swanson, Director, Directorate of Construction at (202) 219-8644.

Sincerely,

Joseph A. Dear
Assistant Secretary

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace