Back to Federal guidance

Inspection-targeting letters and advance notice

Summary A congressional office asked about a Dallas pilot that used voluntary injury data to target inspections and whether its employer letters gave unlawful advance notice. OSHA said the letters went to all employers in the area and did not identify when or whether a particular inspection would occur. The response also described the pilot and cited the agency directive for experimental programs; OSHA now labels it an archive document.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-11-21
Date issued
November 21, 1995
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

November 21, 1995

Honorable Bill K. Brewster
U.S. House of Representatives
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Congressman Brewster:

Thank you for your letter of August 25, to Ms. Geraldine Harris of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Your constituent's concerns are answered in the same order they were addressed to us. Please accept our apology for the delay in providing this response.

  1. Enclosed are two lists of most cited standards for fiscal year 1995 as your constituent requested. The format for both is that the most frequently cited standards is listed at the top. Due to the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) search parameters, the top 100 of all industries list contains both "general industry" (29 CFR 1910) and "construction" (29 CFR 1926) citations. The construction citations have been lined out of the "all industry" list for ease of reading. The general industry standards that appear on the "construction" list reflect the 29 CFR 1910 standards relevant to and citable in construction.

  2. The regulation identifiers 1218-AB41 and 1218-AB24 have no relationship with the Targeting Program which is currently being used in the Dallas Area Office. The pilot program implemented in the Dallas Area Office was designed to enhance targeting of programmed inspections for both safety and health. The purpose of the program was to: (1) permit the use of site-specific injury and illness information to prioritize inspections; (2) permit better planning of resource allocation; and (3) permit compliance officers to focus all available tools on making a real impact on safety and health in inspected establishments.

The response to the injury & illness data requests are voluntary, and the vast majority respond willingly to the request. Verbal response to the program has been over-whelmingly strong in both the employer community (who state that they re-dedicated their focus on safety and health after receiving the notice), and the professional safety and health community (who state they appreciate OSHA's focus on those who need the most help). Compliance officers also like the program because they enter each facility better prepared to make a difference in workplace safety and health.

The benefits of this program are: (1) more prudent allocation of employer and OSHA resources; (2) enhanced inspection focus on real hazards at each facility; (3) demonstration of inspection effectiveness through analysis of post-inspection site-specific injury/illness information; and, (4) increased participation in the OSHA Consultation Program, which is referenced in the first notice to employers.

The directive which establishes procedures for the implementation of experimental programs is OSHA Instruction CPL 2.102, Procedures for Approval of Local Emphasis Programs (LEPs) and Experimental Programs. A copy of the directive is attached for your review.

  1. You also requested clarification on OSHA rules governing site inspections, specifically the giving of advance notice to employers. Section 2(b)(10) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) prohibits giving advance notice of any inspection and provides sanctions for any individual violating this prohibition. Section 17(f) of the OSH Act provides further guidance by allowing advanced notice when authorized by the Secretary or the Secretary's designee.

The Agency approved this pilot program for implementation to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach toward targeting. All employers within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Area Office receive identical inquiry letters. These information request letters, from a practical prospective, do not give individual employers specific advanced notice of when or even if an inspection will take place.

Thank you for referring your constituent's letter and the opportunity to comment to his/her's concerns. If you have any questions on this information, please contact Mr. John B. Miles, Jr., Director of Compliance Programs (202)219-9308.

Sincerely,
Joseph A. Dear
Assistant Secretary

Enclosure

[Congressional request reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace