Back to Federal guidance

Testing scaffold tie-off points during erection and dismantling

Summary A scaffold engineer asked OSHA to review proposed testing procedures for fall-arrest tie-off locations while crews erected or dismantled scaffolds. OSHA recommended removing references to ordinary scaffold use and testing the weakest arrangement expected under proper erection or dismantling procedures. OSHA now labels the letter an archive document.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-09-25
Date issued
September 25, 1995
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

September 25, 1995

Mr. David Glabe
Western Falsework Engineering, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Glabe:

This is in response to your May 11, memorandum requesting the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to comment on the Scaffold Industry Association testing procedures to determine fall arrest tie-off locations during the erection and dismantling of scaffolds.

We have reviewed the procedure and offer the following comments:

Under the section "General Rules for all Tests", rule 3 references erection, dismantling, and use. We would recommend you remove the reference to "use." Once the scaffold system is in use, guardrails would be in place and tie-off would not apply.

In several areas of the test procedures, you specify testing the least stable or weakest configuration. We would recommend that you modify this to make it clear that your intention is to test the least stable or weakest configuration you would expect to find using proper erection or dismantling procedures. That is, you would not expect to find employees dismantling or erecting scaffolding several sections high without all the required components in place in the lower sections.

If you have further questions on this matter, please contact me or [Mr. Noah Connell] of my staff at [(202) 219-7207.]

Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health.

Sincerely,
Roy F. Gurnham, P.E., J.D.
Director
Office of Construction and Maritime
Compliance Assistance

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace