Back to Federal guidance

Suspended-load variance analysis for spacecraft lifting

Summary OSHA staff reviewed a proposed variance that would let employees work beneath a suspended spacecraft. The memo recommended denial because the proposed practices did not provide protection equivalent to the cited rules, while offering to discuss safer alternatives if compliance was truly infeasible. It is an internal recommendation, not the final variance decision, and OSHA archives it.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-09-18
Date issued
September 18, 1995
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent policy. It recommends action on a variance application but does not grant or deny the variance itself.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent policy. It recommends action on a variance application but does not grant or deny the variance itself. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

September 18, 1995

MEMORANDUM FOR: STEVE MALLINGER
Acting Director
Directorate of Technical Support

FROM: JOHN MILES
Director
Directorate of Compliance

SUBJECT: Comments on Variance Application Number 2293: VARIANCE
REQUEST FROM 1910.179(n)(3)(vi), 1910.180(h)(3)(vi), and 1910.180(h)(4)(ii)

This memorandum is in response to your request for assistance in evaluating a variance request for Lockheed Martin Astro Space.

Practices that the employer wishes to implement do not provide the same degree of protection as does compliance with the referenced OSHA standards. Therefore, the application should be denied. However, Lockheed Martin should be advised that if they can demonstrate that it is truly infeasible to perform the lifting task, without having employees under the load, the Office Of General Industry Compliance Assistance (GICA) will work with them to develop work practices which will reduce the potential for injury as much as is feasible. The proposals contained in the variance application will be a good starting point in the development of such practices.

The variance application proposes that employees be under suspended loads under certain specific conditions. The applicable OSHA standards require that employees be kept clear of suspended loads, or that the employer shall require that the operator avoid carrying loads over people.

Paragraph (a)(4) of 29 CFR 1905.11 contains the requirement relevant to the preceding comments. It requires that the applicant provide:

"A statement showing how the conditions, practices, means, methods, operations, or processes used or proposed to be used would provide employment and places of employment to employees which are as safe and healthful as those required by the standard from which a variance is sought."

Also, please note that if a sling is used in the lifting of the spacecraft, paragraph (c)(9) of 29 CFR 1910.184 is also applicable to the lifting operation. (A sling is defined as being an assembly which connects the load to the material handling equipment.) That paragraph requires that employees be kept clear of suspended loads. If a sling is used the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.184 should also be considered when making the determination concerning the alternative practices the employer wants to implement.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace