Back to Federal guidance

Recording disease exposures and vaccination boosters

Summary A state labor agency asked whether possible disease exposure without injury belonged on OSHA's former injury log and whether a hepatitis booster changed the answer. OSHA said possible exposure alone was not recordable, but a known work-related bloodborne-pathogen exposure followed by a hepatitis booster met its then-current medical-treatment criterion. OSHA now labels the letter an archive document.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-08-22
Date issued
August 22, 1995
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

August 22, 1995

Ms. Lisann Rolle
Research Analyst
Washington State Department
of Labor and Industries Division
of Research and Information Services
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Ms. Rolle:

Thank you for you letter dated August 9, requesting several interpretations regarding OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping requirements. I will address your questions in the order they were presented and whenever possible, I will refer to the Recordkeeping Guidelines of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses by stating the appropriate page and Q&A numbers.

Q1. Are exposures with no documented injury or illness recordable?

A1. No. The OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping system is not designed to record exposure incidents. Q&A B-6 on page 30 states "Entries on the log...should be made only when the exposure results in a recordable work injury or illness." What must be determined is whether the employees have developed an abnormal condition (i.e. pertussis or meningitis) as a result of the exposure. Furthermore, Q&A B-9 on page 30 addresses the situation of receiving preventative care when not injured or ill.

Q2. Is possible exposure to rabies (involving no bite or other injury) recordable?

A2. No. See question 1 above.

Q3. An employee experiences a bloodborne pathogen exposure incident and receives a hepatitis vaccination booster as a result. Is this recordable?

A3. Yes. A work related bloodborne pathogen exposure incident shall be considered a case and would be recordable if it meets one or more of the following requirements:

  1. The incident results in a loss of consciousness, transfer to another job, or a work restriction, or

  2. The incident results in the administration or recommendation of medical treatment beyond first aid (e.g., gamma globulin, hepatitis B immune globulin, hepatitis B vaccine, zidovudine, or other prescription medications), or

  3. The incident results in a diagnosis of seroconversion.

The booster the employee received must be considered medical treatment and therefore meets criteria 2.

Q4. If there is a possibility of a bloodborne pathogen exposure incident, but no definite exposure, which results in medical treatment, is it recordable?

A4. No. There must be a known bloodborne pathogen exposure incident to be considered a case.

Please be aware that OSHA is currently in the process of revising its injury and illness recordkeeping requirements. In doing so, we are addressing the issues you have raised in your letter concerning exposures in general and bloodborne pathogen exposure incidents. We anticipate publishing the proposed revision in the Federal Register this fall. I look forward to receiving any comments you may have regarding this matter at that time.

I hope you find this information useful. For further information concerning the recordability of bloodborne pathogen exposure incidents, please review the attached memoranda. If you have any further questions, please call us at Area Code (202) 219-6463.

Sincerely,
Bob Whitmore
Chief
Division of Recordkeeping Requirements

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace