Back to Federal guidance

Rebar climbing policy limited to built-in-place assemblies

Summary A steel firm asked OSHA to extend its fall-protection interpretation for climbing rebar to assemblies hoisted into place. OSHA said the then-current exception was limited to the work addressed in the original petition and had not yet been expanded; it would consider new information later. OSHA now labels the letter an archive document.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-08-11-2
Date issued
August 11, 1995
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

August 11, 1995

Mr. Tom Overstreet
Safety Director
Fontana Steel Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Overstreet:

This is in response to your July 11 letter in which you express concern about the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) policy regarding the use of rebar assemblies as ladders.

The policy expressed in the December 23, 1994 letter to Mr. Codding was the result of and directly reflects the original petition received from Mr. Codding. As the policy is, in essence, an exemption from the plain reading of the language of 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(5), it was OSHA's intention to limit the policy to the scope of the original petition. Mr. Pryor's letter to OSHA simply requested a clarification of the policy and was not a petition to change or expand the policy.

In addition to receiving your letter, Mr. Codding has again been in contact with this office to see if the policy could be extended to rebar assemblies that are hoisted into place. Mr. Codding is in the process of putting together a presentation to demonstrate the need to expand the exemption. A date has not yet been set for the presentation but it is expected to occur before the end of September. Based on the information provided by you and Mr. Codding, OSHA will determine at that time whether or not to change the rebar policy. In the meantime, you may want to contact Mr. Codding at (703) 591-1870 to coordinate your information.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Mr. Dale Cavanaugh of my staff at (202) 219-8136.

Sincerely,
Roy F. Gurnham, P.E., J.D.
Director
Office of Construction and Maritime
Assistance

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace