Back to Federal guidance

Repair of crane sheaves by grinding

Summary A shipping association asked OSHA about its earlier memo on refurbishing crane sheaves. OSHA said the memo was meant to guide acceptable repairs and the choice between resurfacing and replacement, rather than set precise damage tolerances. OSHA labels the letter an archive document.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-06-30-0
Date issued
June 30, 1995
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

June 30, 1995

Mr. Daniel R. Harrison
Director
Hampton Roads Shipping Association
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Harrison:

This is in response to your May 10, letter addressed to Mr. Joseph A. Dear regarding a January 19 memorandum issued by the Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance.

The January 19 memorandum was issued in response to a report that sheaves on cranes had been refurbished by means of hand-grinding the sheaves in place using portable tools. The purpose of the memorandum was to provide guidance with respect to what constitutes an acceptable repair method, not to provide detailed tolerances and specifications for the examination and quantification of sheave damage. The related discussion was, therefore, limited in scope to an overview of what causes corrugated (wire rope imprint) damage to sheave grove surfaces, the available options (i.e., sheave resurfacing or replacement) and the principal factors which must be considered when resurfacing is the method of refurbishment. Within the context of the expressed purpose, the memorandum remains germane.

We appreciate your comments and interest in occupational safety and health.

Sincerely,
John B. Miles, Jr.
Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace