Back to Federal guidance

Foot protection and falling-object hazards

Summary A senator asked whether a new OSHA rule required construction workers to wear steel-toed shoes. OSHA said its recent fall protection rule added toeboard requirements in some situations but did not require those shoes; suitable foot protection was required when foot hazards were present.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-04-28-0
Date issued
April 28, 1995
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 28, 1995

The Honorable Charles E. Grassley
United States Senate
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Senator Grassley:

Thank you for your letter of March 10 on behalf of your constitute, Mr. Larry L. Larson, concerning a new Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation requiring foot protection for employees exposed to falling object hazards. I appreciate the opportunity to address this matter.

As Mr. Roy Gurnham of my staff discussed with Ms. Hope Ann Hegstrom of your office on April 17, OSHA did not recently issue such a rule. Although, OSHA did promulgate a rule August 9, 1994 (copy enclosed) that requires toeboards to be provided in certain circumstances to protect employees against the hazard of falling objects (please see p. 40733 of the enclosed rule for fall protection), there is nothing in that rule that requires steel toed shoes to be worn. Of course, OSHA does require appropriate foot protection to be worn when there are foot hazards present (please see copy of 1926.95). Such hazards include nails in boards and equipment or materials that can cause injury if dropped. When such hazards are absent, such as may be the case in Mr. Larson's line of work, then there is no need to wear such protection.

If Mr. Larson would like additional information, he may contact Mr. Gurnham or Mr. Dale Cavanaugh of my staff in the Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance at (202) 219-8136.

Thank you for your interest in this matter.

Sincerely,
Joseph A. Dear
Assistant Secretary
Enclosures

[Requester letter reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace