Back to Federal guidance

Fall distance and safety factor for horizontal lifelines

Summary A manufacturer asked how fall distance and the safety factor apply to horizontal lifelines. OSHA said free fall was limited to six feet, deceleration to 42 inches, lifeline elongation was excluded from deceleration, and total distance could not allow contact with a lower level. The safety factor of two applied to anticipated maximum arrest force, rather than fall energy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1995-02-09
Date issued
February 9, 1995
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

February 9, 1995
Mr. J. Thomas Wolner
D.B. Industries, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Wolner:
Your December 5 letter addressed to Ms. Barbara Bielaski requesting an interpretation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) final rule on fall protection concerning the criteria for personal fall arrest systems has been forwarded to the Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance for response.
Your interpretation regarding total fall distance experienced by the user during fall arrest on a horizontal lifeline is correct as stated in your letter. Specifically, the free fall distance is limited to 6 feet; the deceleration distance must not exceed 42 inches; lifeline elongation is not included in deceleration distance; and the total fall distance is unregulated except that the employee cannot make contact with a lower level.
Regarding your question on applying the safety factor, the safety factor of two should be applied based on the anticipated maximum arrest force and not the fall energy. The example in your letter of determining the maximum arresting force and then doubling that figure to arrive at the system design load is the approach to be taken.
If we can be of any further assistance, please contact me or Mr. Dale Cavanaugh of my staff at (202) 219-8136.
Sincerely,
Roy F. Gurnham, P.E., J.D. Director
Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance

[Requester letter reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace