Back to Federal guidance

Bloodborne pathogen coverage for news media workers

Summary OSHA said bloodborne pathogen coverage for news media employees depends on reasonably anticipated contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials, not job title. Media employers assigning staff to accident scenes must assess the exposure and comply where the standard applies. OSHA labels the memorandum an archive document.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1994-11-22-1
Date issued
November 22, 1994
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent current policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent current policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

November 22, 1994


MEMORANDUM FOR: JAMES W. STANLEY
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY

FROM: JOHN B. MILES, JR., DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS

SUBJECT: BLOODBORNE PATHOGEN AND HAZWOPER-MEDIA COVERAGE


This is in response to your request for information on whether OSHA has guidance relating to exposures of media employees to bloodborne pathogens and to situations covered under HAZWOPER.
There is not a booklet or outreach material that specifically addresses exposure of this precise kind. The question concerning members of the media and potential exposure on hazwoper sites has been addressed recently in a letter, which is available on CD-ROM. A copy is attached for your review.
The bloodborne pathogens standard would apply if there is a reasonable anticipation of skin, eye, or mucous membrane contact with blood. The employer is responsible for determining which job classifications or tasks may result in worker contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials. The standard relates to occupational exposure, regardless of where that exposure may occur, since risk of infection with bloodborne pathogens is dependent on the likelihood of exposure to blood or OPIM regardless of the particular job title or place of employment. If certain individuals in the media are routinely assigned the task of covering accidents scenes, the employer will need to evaluate the hazard and comply with the standard.
Attachment

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace