Back to Federal guidance

Fall hazard basis for a bridge construction PPE citation

Summary Reviewing a proposed citation for bridge construction over a river, OSHA said 29 CFR 1926.95(a) could address an impact hazard from falling onto a shallow riverbed. Drowning hazards were addressed by other standards, and hypothermia seemed unlikely on the stated facts.
Document
Federal guidance
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1994-08-22
Date issued
August 22, 1994
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

August 22, 1994

MEMORANDUM FOR: CINDY A. COE

Acting Regional Administrator

THROUGH: JOHN B. MILES Director Directorate of Compliance Programs

FROM: ROY F. GURNHAM, Director Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance

SUBJECT: Request for Review of Potential 1926.95(a) Citation for Fall Protection in Steel Erection

We have reviewed your request to issue a willful citation to Miller Construction Company for failure to provide fall protection during bridge construction. We concur with your request to issue a citation under 1926.95(a).

The 1926.95(a) citation which you propose to issue, however, would have to be based on a hazard other than drowning since drowning hazards are addressed by other standards (also proposed for citation). Hypothermia does not seem a likely hazard under the facts as we understand them. If the water temperature was 50 to 60 degrees Fahrenheit, a worker would probably be pulled from the water well before a hypothermia danger would arise. The most likely hazard, therefore, would be an impact hazard. The object would be to show the possibility of injury in the event of a fall and that a reasonable person would recognize this possibility and the need to protect against it. If the river was very shallow in places beneath the work areas, the likelihood of injuries as a result of stiking the river bed can probably be established although you may need expert testimony should the citation be contested and litigated.

If you have any further questions please contact me (at extension 150) or Mr. Dale Cavanaugh (at extension 149) of my staff at 202/219-8136.

[Earlier internal memoranda and proposed citation reproduced on OSHA page; omitted here.]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace