Back to Federal guidance

Foot protection against falling objects at construction sites

Summary A senator asked whether OSHA required steel-toed shoes for all workers exposed to falling objects. OSHA said the cited fall-protection rule did not impose a blanket steel-toed-shoe requirement; suitable foot protection was required when foot hazards such as nails or dropped materials were present. The published letter contains an unexplained date discrepancy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1994-05-19
Date issued
May 19, 1994
Status
Active
The page is dated May 19, 1994, but its text refers to an August 9, 1994 rule; OSHA does not explain that date discrepancy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

May 19, 1994

The Honorable Tom Harkin
United States Senate
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Senator Harkin:

Thank you for your letter of March 30 on behalf of your constituent, Mr. Larry L. Larson, concerning a new Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation requiring foot protection for employees exposed to falling object hazards. I appreciate the opportunity to address this matter.

As Mr. Roy Gurnham of my staff discussed with Mr. Don Wiberg of your office on May 4, OSHA did not recently issue such a rule. Although, OSHA did promulgate a rule August 9, 1994 that requires toeboards to be provided in certain circumstances to protect employees against the hazard of falling objects (please see p. 40733 of the enclosed rule for fall protection), there is nothing in that rule that requires steel toed shoes to be worn. Of course, OSHA does require appropriate foot protection to be worn when there are foot hazards present (please see copy of 1926.95). Such hazards include nails in boards and equipment or materials that can cause injury if dropped. When such hazards are absent, such as may be the case in Mr. Larson's line of work, then there is no need to wear such protection.

If Mr. Larson would like additional information, he may contact Mr. Gurnham or Mr. Dale Cavanaugh of my staff in the Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance at (202) 219-8136.

Thank you for your interest in this matter.

Sincerely,
Joseph A. Dear
Assistant Secretary

Enclosures

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace