OSHA and Coast Guard authority over foreign-flag vessels
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
April 11, 1994
MEMORANDUM FOR: FRANK STRASHEIM
Regional Administrator
THROUGH: H. BERRIEN ZETTLER
Deputy Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs
FROM: ROY F. GURNHAM, DIRECTOR
Office of Construction and Maritime Compliance Assistance
SUBJECT: Vessel Safety - OSHA or U.S. Coast Guard
REFERENCE: (a) Mr. Gillotti's memorandum addressed to Mr. Joe Nolan, Chief, Division of Maritime Compliance Assistance, dated February 22, 1994 regarding, "Vessel Safety - OSHA or U.S. Coast Guard"
(b) National Association of Waterfront Employers letter from the Executive Director/General Counsel to NAWE Members dated January 26, 1994
ENCLOSURES: (1) International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention No. 32
(2) International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention No. 152
This is in response to Mr. Gillotti's subject memorandum, reference (a), requesting a review of reference (b) and advice with respect to OSHA/Coast Guard jurisdiction over vessel conditions and ship's cargo gear.
The expansion of Coast Guard authority over foreign flag vessels in 1992 only pertains to the conditions of the vessel. This change in Coast Guard authority was in response to recent international conventions which provide that, for vessels which have valid certificates or are required to have such certificates, port states may inspect foreign vessels to ensure that the conditions upon which certificates were based still exist. Therefore, under 46 USC 3303, the Coast Guard now has the authority to inspect the conditions of foreign vessels and, if necessary, order a foreign vessel crew to stop work and/or order a foreign vessel to be repaired by the crew or vessel representatives.
This 1992 change in Coast Guard authority over foreign flag vessels does not have any impact on OSHA's jurisdiction with respect to enforcement on foreign vessels, including cargo gear. The Coast Guard has no authority to take enforcement action against marine cargo handling employers under the vessel inspection laws. In this regard the Coast Guard only has authority to take enforcement action against the owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, individual in charge of a vessel, or a vessel (46 U.S.C. 3313, 3318). Therefore, Section 4(b)(1) of the OSH Act does not preclude OSHA enforcement against marine cargo handling employers. See Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. and Sinapp Co. of Staten Island, 1975-76 CCH OSHD Paragraph 20,092,page 23,899 (OSHRC Docket Nos. 4091 and 4078) (Section 4(b)(1) does not bar OSHA enforcement against an employer who is not subject to enforcement action by another Federal agency). Furthermore, OSHA has authority over marine cargo handling employers pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 941, the safety regulations provisions of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers Compensation Act. See Secretary's Order 1-90 (delegating OSH Act, LHWCA and other authority to OSHA). Thus, OSHA Instruction CPL 2-1.3B specifies:
"On foreign flag vessels, citations for violations shall be issued to each separate employer (covered by the Act) having employees exposed. CSHO's shall examine the vessel's Cargo Gear Register and supporting documents to establish that they are current and valid."
The term "employer" here refers to marine cargo handling companies (i.e., stevedoring and longshoring operations). The enforcement of cargo gear regulations and the requirements for gear certification in the maritime program will continue to be conducted in accordance with the policy and procedures specified in OSHA Instruction CPL 2-1.3B.
Vessels of countries which are signatory to International Labor Organization Convention No. 152 (i.e.; Brazil, Congo, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Egypt, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, Guinea, Iraq, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Spain, Sweden and Tanzania) will be accepted as being in compliance if they meet or exceed ILO Convention No. 152 requirements. Vessels of most other countries remain subject to ILO Convention No. 32 requirements. For your convenience we have enclosed copies of these two ILO agreements.
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace