Illnesses contracted outside OSHA's geographic reach
Apply this to your situation
This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.
NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.
October 26, 1993
Ms. Lyn E. Lang
Safety Systems Administrator
Aluminum Company of America
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Ms. Lang:
Thank you for your letter dated September 23, requesting an interpretation for the proper recording procedure for illnesses contracted outside of the United States. Q&A A-12 on page 4 of the Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses best addresses this situation. Records need not be kept for employees when they are outside the geographic scope of coverage prescribed by Section 4(a) of the Act. Neither case described in your letter would be recordable, as long as the illness exposure occurred outside of the United States and it's territories. More specifically, the second scenario may be treated in the same fashion as symptoms that merely surface on the employers premises, but are the result of a non-work related event or exposure off premises (see Q&A C-8 on page 34 of the Guidelines).
I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions or comments, please contact us at Area Code (202) 219-6463.
Sincerely,
Bob Whitmore
Chief
Division of Recordkeeping Requirements
What does federal law require in your situation?
Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace