Back to Federal guidance

Employer safety responsibilities for work at home

Summary A correspondent asked how home-based work affected OSHA's role. OSHA said employer-directed materials, equipment, and methods still carried safety responsibilities, while it reserved judgment about other conditions in a home workplace. The page warns that the issue was under review and archives the letter as potentially outdated.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1993-10-07
Date issued
October 7, 1993
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent current policy. The page also says work-at-home coverage issues were under review.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent current policy. The page also says work-at-home coverage issues were under review. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

THE ISSUES RELATED TO OSHA AND WORK AT HOME ARE PRESENTLY UNDER REVIEW. SEE ASSISTANT SECRETARY JEFFRESS' JANUARY 28, 2000 TESTIMONY REGARDING OSHA COVERAGE OF WORKING AT HOME.

October 7, 1993

Mr. Hyman Richman
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Richman:

This is in further response to your letter of July 21 in which you inquired about the effect of flexi-place on the mission and jurisdiction of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

We agree that the flexi-place concept is likely to continue to be accepted and implemented. It offers chance to reduce overhead costs while increasing the effectiveness of an operation. The savings on office space, travel time, and commuting can be mutually beneficial to employer and employee.

The employer is not likely to relinquish the right to determine the conditions of employment, or control over the processes or production methods associated with the business. The employer decides if, when, and under what conditions an employee may work at home. This gives the employer authority to exercise the full range of responsibilities pertaining to the safety and health of the employee. His responsibility to uphold the safety and health laws extends as far, and is equally as binding, as his responsibility to protect the fiscal well being of the organization.

Assurance of safe and healthful working conditions for the employee should be a precondition for any home based work assignment. This includes materials, equipment and methods provided or required by the employer. We reserve judgement at this time as to the extent of OSHA coverage for other conditions found in the home workplace. We note, however, that the home workplace may create special hazards for others who dwell with the worker, especially children. As the number of employees using flexi-place expands, scheduled inspections become increasingly less practical as the primary OSHA enforcement approach for the protection of these employees. Training and education, agreements between employees and employers, and other strategies which enable the employee to take the lead in fostering his/her own safety and health will become more important as the line between home and the workplace fades.

Although flexi-place and other unnamed changes that are certain to occur in the near future will challenge OSHA to rethink and revise some of the current methods, the requirement to protect the safety and health of American workers will continue as the primary mission of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The Agency will adjust to the changes and continue to fulfill its mission.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this matter.

Sincerely,
Roger A. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace