Back to Federal guidance

Workplace violence and the OSH Act general duty clause

Summary A worker asked whether OSHA standards address violent employee behavior. OSHA said no specific federal OSHA standard addressed it at the time, but the OSH Act's general duty clause could apply where violence is a recognized serious hazard and feasible steps could reduce the risk. A citation would depend on the facts, including foreseeability and feasible controls; random violence not characteristic of the work would not support one under that analysis.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-12-10
Date issued
December 10, 1992
Status
Active
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

December 10, 1992
Mr. John R. Schuller
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Schuller:
This is in response to your letter of October 12, inquiring whether there are Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards which address violent employee behavior in the workplace. We apologize for the delay in this response.
Although currently there are no specific Federal OSHA standards to address these problems, the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), in Section 5(a)(1), provides that "each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees." In a workplace where the risk of violence and serious personal injury are significant enough to be "recognized hazards," the general duty clause would require the employer to take feasible steps to minimize those risks. Failure of an employer to implement feasible means of abatement of these hazards could result in the finding of an OSH Act violation.
On the other hand, the occurrence of acts of violence which are not "recognized" as characteristic of employment and represent random antisocial acts which may occur anywhere would not subject the employer to a citation for a violation of the OSH Act.
Whether or not an employer can be cited for a violation of Section 5(a)(1) is entirely dependent upon the specific facts, which will be unique in each situation. The recognizability and foreseeability of the hazard, and the feasibility of the means of abatement are some of the critical factors to be considered.
This overall issue of violence in the workplace is under review. At this time, we feel that the situation you described is best handled through your company's employee relations activities.
We hope this information is responsive to your concerns.
Sincerely,
Roger A. Clark, Director
[Directorate of Enforcement Programs]
[Corrected 10/22/2004]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace