Back to Federal guidance

First aid proximity, designated aiders, and bloodborne pathogen coverage

Summary A safety technician asked when first aid training and bloodborne pathogen protections are required. OSHA said first aid training is unnecessary if medical or emergency help can reach workers within the applicable proximity period, and merely training a worker does not itself require assigning first aid duty. Designated aiders with reasonably anticipated blood exposure are covered by the bloodborne pathogens rule; spontaneous Good Samaritan acts are outside it. OSHA later struck its specific response-time statement and referred readers to a 2002 letter for current policy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-10-05-0
Date issued
October 5, 1992
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent its policy. OSHA also edited the page on June 12, 2002 to strike its former response-time figures and direct readers to its April 18, 2002 letter for current policy; the remaining answers are published with a June 2, 2005 correction.
Status last verified October 10, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document that may no longer represent its policy. OSHA also edited the page on June 12, 2002 to strike its former response-time figures and direct readers to its April 18, 2002 letter for current policy; the remaining answers are published with a June 2, 2005 correction. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

October 5, 1992
Mr. Keith Jepsen
Environmental and Safety Technician
Environmental & Safety Services Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Jepsen:
Thank you for your inquiry of October 29, requesting an interpretation of application of employee training in first aid and Bloodborne Pathogen Standard with respect to 29 CFR 1910.151. Please accept our apology for the delay in responding.
You specifically requested answers to the following questions:
Question 1. Do employees need to be trained in first aid regardless of the meaning of "near proximity" in 1910.151, if welding is done at the facility?
Response: ~~In areas where accidents resulting in suffocation, severe bleeding, or other life threatening injury or illness can be expected, a 3 to 4 minute response time, from time of injury to time of administering first aid, is required. In other circumstances, i.e., where a life-threatening injury is an unlikely outcome of an accident, a 15 minute response time is acceptable.~~
[This letter was edited on 6/12/2002 to strike information that no longer reflects current OSHA policy. Please see the 4/18/02 letter to Mr. Mateus for the current policy.]
If an employer can take employees to an infirmary, clinic, or hospital, or if outside emergency assistance can arrive within the allotted times, the employer is not required to train employees in first aid.
Question 2. If employees have been trained in first aid, do they need to be designated or assigned first aid duties?
Response: 1910.151(b) does not require the employer to assign employees first aid duties. However, in the absence of professional medical care in near proximity, it would be wise to assign employees with adequate training to such duties.
Question 3. Does the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard apply to these individuals with first aid training.
Response: Employees who have occupational exposure to blood of other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) are covered by the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. Occupational exposure is defined as reasonably anticipated skin, eye, mucous membrane, or parenteral contact with blood or OPIM that may result from the performance of an employee's duties. The vaccination requirements, as well as all other provisions of the standard, apply to all employees who have occupational exposure.
Employees who are designated to provide first aid as a primary or collateral duty are covered by the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard; however, employees who perform unanticipated "Good Samaritan acts" are excluded from coverage by the standard, since such an action does not constitute "occupational exposure."
We appreciate your interest in employee safety and health. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Roger A. Clark, Director
[Directorate of Enforcement Programs]
[Corrected 6/2/2005]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace