Back to Federal guidance

Protective equipment for hospital hazardous substance response

Summary A university safety official asked whether hospital personnel treating victims of hazardous releases always needed Level A protective equipment. OSHA said Level A applied where skin absorption could cause immediate serious harm or where high splash or vapor exposure required the highest protection. A lower level could be appropriate if worst-case planning showed the expected hazards did not require Level A.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-09-17-3
Date issued
September 17, 1992
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA marks this page as an archive document and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA marks this page as an archive document and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

September 17, 1992
Mr. John T. Marchese
Assistant Director
Environmental Health and Safety
SUNY at Stony Brook
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Marchese:
This is in response to your inquiry of August 5, concerning the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) "Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency response" (HAZWOPER) regulation, 29 CFR 1910.120.
Your question concerns clarification of personal protective equipment (PPE) for medical personnel treating victims contaminated with hazardous material, and, specifically, whether Level A PPE would be necessary.
Paragraph (g)(3)(iv) of the standard states that Level A totally encapsulating chemical protective suits "shall be used in conditions where skin absorption of a hazardous substance may result in a substantial possibility of immediate death, immediate serious illness or injury, or impair the ability to escape." Further, Appendix B, Part B(I), of the standard provides nonmandatory guidance on selection of the appropriate level of PPE, front which the following recommendations are drawn.
Level A protection offers the highest level of skin, eye, and respiratory protection and should be used whenever work functions involve a high potential for splash, immersion, or exposure via vapors, gases or particulates, to materials harmful to skin or capable of being absorbed through the skin.
Level B protection is appropriate when conditions require a high level of respiratory protection due to inhalation hazard but require less skin protection, because chemicals harmful to the skin or capable of absorption through the skin are not present as a splash or immersion hazard or in high concentrations in atmospheric contaminants.
Emergency response planning, including selection of PPE, is to be based on worst-case scenarios. If you were able to determine, in conjunction with the small industries in your community, that worst-case scenarios of contaminated victims arriving at your facility would not pose hazards requiring use of Level A gear, then a lower level of personal protective equipment would be appropriate.
We hope this information is helpful. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact us at (202) 523-8036.
Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace