Back to Federal guidance

OSHA inspection, abatement and penalty procedures

Summary A member of Congress asked how OSHA handles citations, deadlines, costs and equipment that does not meet safety standards. OSHA said its area director sets an abatement date based on the hazard and circumstances, and may reduce a penalty if an employer shows financial hardship at an informal conference. It also described how employers may correct equipment and when an eyewash unit may need replacement.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-07-30
Date issued
July 30, 1992
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA marks this page as an archive document and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA marks this page as an archive document and says it may no longer represent OSHA policy. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

July 30, 1992

The Honorable John W. Cox
U.S. House of Representatives
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Congressman Cox:

This is in further response to your letter of June 2, addressed to Mr. Tadd Linsenmayer, Director, Office of Intra-Governmental Affairs, requesting information on how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration enforces compliance with workplace safety and health standards. Your letter was forwarded to the Directorate of Compliance Programs for response. The questions you asked and our responses follow:

Question 1: Explain the process involved when an inspection is done and violations are found.

Reply: At the end of an inspection, the Compliance Safety and Health Officer (CSHO) conducts a "closing conference" with the employer or his designated representative and a representative of the employees. At this conference, the CSHO discusses any apparent violations, requests input on abatement times, explains the citation process thoroughly and gives the employer a copy of the OSHA 3000 publication (Revised 1992), Employer Rights & Responsibilities Following an OSHA Inspection. We have enclosed a copy of this publication which explains the post-inspection process.

Question 2: How long does an organization have to come into compliance?

Reply: The abatement period is the shortest interval within which the employer can reasonably be expected to correct the violations. We believe that most violations can be corrected in 30 days or less. The OSHA Area Director will set an expected abatement date for each violation, based on the circumstances and the gravity of the hazard.

Question 3: Is any consideration given to the effect the cost of coming into compliance will have on an organization's budget and, is the organization allowed some time to work the cost into its budget?

Reply: An organization's budget is not normally taken into consideration in determining penalties to be assessed on citations. However, after a citation is issued, if an employer presents at an informal conference convincing evidence of inability to pay a penalty because of financial difficulties, the Area Director may determine that a penalty reduction is appropriate.

Question 4: What is the procedure to help employers come into compliance when equipment does not completely meet the OSHA standard?

Reply: The purpose and goal of OSHA is to assure safe and healthful workplaces for all employees, and to that end, it is our policy for CSHO's, during the course of inspections, to offer appropriate abatement suggestions to the employer. This information is meant to provide guidance to the employer in developing acceptable abatement methods or in seeking appropriate professional assistance. The employer is not limited to nor is he/she bound by the suggestions offered, but it is his/her responsibility to select and carry out an effective abatement action for each hazard in the workplace. OSHA is willing to work with employers even after citations have been issued to achieve effective abatement of hazards.

Question 5: Please address a problem concerning a health clinic that had and eyewash station in place and was ordered to replace it with a more expensive model.

Reply: OSHA depends on the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) consensus standard, ANSI Z358.1-1990, Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment, for requirements for eysewashes. OSHA does not object if employers comply with this ANSI standard by modifying existing emergency eyewash and shower equipment. However, if existing equipment does not meet the ANSI standard and cannot be modified to meet it, then the employer may be required to replace the existing equipment with an emergency eyewash and shower that will meet the ANSI standard.

I hope this information is helpful. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

Enclosure

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace