Back to Federal guidance

ANSI nonionizing radiation warning signs

Summary A state attorney general's office asked whether an ANSI radio frequency radiation warning sign could satisfy OSHA's nonionizing radiation sign rule. OSHA said the ANSI C95.2-1982 sign described in the request provided equal or greater protection and its display would not violate 29 CFR 1910.97.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-06-18
Date issued
June 18, 1992
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

June 18, 1992

Mr. Richard C. Carroll
Assistant Attorney General
Commonwealth of Kentucky
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Carroll:

This is in response to your letter dated May 11, to Patricia K. Clark, Director of the Directorate of Compliance Programs, requesting confirmation of an interpretation of the nonionizing radiation warning sign standard at 29 CFR 1910.97.

This is to confirm that an employer who displays a nonionizing radiation warning sign which meets American National Standards Institutes (ANSI) standard, ANSI C95.2-1982 to warn employees about specific radio frequency radiation hazards is considered not to be in violation of 1910.97. This interpretation is predicated on the following evaluation. The ANSI nonionizing radiation warning sign, that is, a yellow triangle with a black symbol of a "radiator", more clearly depicts the hazard. This ANSI warning sign which has been used extensively in this country since 1982 is recognized and accepted by general industry. Therefore the ANSI nonionizing radiation warning sign provides equal or greater protection compared to the nonionizing radiation warning sign required by Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards at 29 CFR 1910.97.

Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
Raymond E. Donnelly, Director
Office of General Industry
Compliance Assistance

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace