Back to Federal guidance

Bloodborne pathogen regulated waste and discarded sharps

Summary A medical department asked when common clinical and restroom waste counted as regulated waste. OSHA said absorbent menstrual products, unsaturated bandages and speculums generally did not meet the definition, but employers had to assess whether blood could be released during handling. It also said discarded insulin syringes posed a hazard to custodial workers and required protection; the posted letter has a 2005 correction.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-05-28
Date issued
May 28, 1992
Status
Active
OSHA's posted letter bears a June 2, 2005 correction.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

May 28, 1992
Mr. John T. McCaffrey, D.O.
Director of Medical Department
Raytheon Company Submarine
Signal Division
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Dr. McCaffrey:
This is in response to your letter of March 9, in which you requested a clarification on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation, 29 CFR 1910.1030, "Occupational Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens". You wrote regarding the coverage of feminine hygiene products, vaginal speculums, bandages, and insulin syringes as regulated waste.
The bloodborne pathogens standard defines regulated waste as liquid or semi-liquid blood or other potentially infectious material (OPIM); contaminated items that would release blood or OPIM in a liquid or semi-liquid state if compressed; items that are caked with dried blood or OPIM and are capable of releasing these materials during handling; contaminated sharps; and pathological and microbiological wastes containing blood or OPIM.
OSHA does not generally consider discarded feminine hygiene products, used to absorb menstrual flow, to fall within the definition of regulated waste. OSHA expects the waste containers into which these products are discarded to be lined in such a way as to protect employees from physical contact with the contents.
Bandages which are not saturated to the point of releasing blood or OPIM if compressed would not be considered as regulated waste. Similarly, vaginal speculums do not normally meet the criteria for regulated waste as defined by the standard.
Beyond these general guidelines, it is the employer's responsibility to determine the existence of regulated waste. This determination is not to be based on actual volume of blood, rather on the potential to release blood or OPIM, e.g., when compacted in the waste container. If OSHA determines, on a case-by-case basis, that sufficient evidence of regulated waste exists, e.g., through such visual factors as a pool of liquid in the bottom of a container or dried blood flaking off during handling, or based on employee interviews, citations may be issued.
Discarded insulin syringes create a potential for exposure for persons emptying the trash whether the insulin is administered by the diabetic herself or by a health care worker and whether the disposal occurs in a health care facility or elsewhere. The employer has the responsibility for protecting custodial workers who are encountering discarded insulin syringes in the trash. This can be accomplished by including those custodial workers in the exposure control plan or by other means such as requiring insulin-using employees to discard their used syringes in special containers.
We hope this information is responsive to your concerns. If you have further questions on this subject, please feel free to contact [the Regional Bloodborne Pathogens Coordinator in our South Boston Regional Office at 617-565-6923].
Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
[Directorate of Enforcement Programs]
[Correction 6/2/2005]

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace