Back to Federal guidance

Hand and torso protection for retail meat cutters

Summary A union asked whether OSHA's meat-cutting protective-equipment directive still applied to retail food operations. OSHA said the directive's substance remained in effect, with suitable hand and torso protection required where applicable; equivalent cut-resistant glove materials could be used. It noted an exception when customer service required frequent removal of mesh gloves and said the standard did not specify who paid for the gear.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-04-17-1
Date issued
April 17, 1992
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 17, 1992

Ms. Jacqueline Nowell, CIH
Assistant Director
Office of Occupational Safety and Health
Collective Bargaining Department
United Food & Commercial Workers
International Union, AFL-CIO & CLC
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Ms. Nowell:

Thank you for your letter of February 25 requesting an interpretation of OSHA Program Directive #100-49. Specifically, you asked whether the provisions of the directive apply to current retail meatcutting operations in the retail food industry. Please accept our apology for the delay in this response.

The directive's content, which addresses hazards to and personal protective equipment (PPE) for the hands and the torsos of retail meatcutters, is unchanged. PPE must be provided, used and properly maintained for these workers. Where the work, such as providing service to customers, requires frequent removal of wire mesh gloves, the use of protective gloves is not, however, required. The standard does not address who is to pay for the PPE.

The reference to wire mesh in the directive is to provide an illustration of cut resistance; equivalent materials may be used. A glove made of a material similar to DuPont's "Kevlar" is a possible substitute. The prohibitions against wire meshed glove usage while operating power equipment referenced in the directive are still applicable.

OSHA's directive system was renumbered on October 30, 1978; the subject directive is now "OSHA Instruction STD 1-6.1". If you have questions on these matters, please contact Mr. Donald Kallstrom of General Industry Compliance Assistance on (202) 523-8031.

Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace