Back to Federal guidance

Handwashing facilities and antiseptic alternatives

Summary A company asked whether a hand-disinfecting system met bloodborne pathogen handwashing rules. OSHA said readily accessible soap-and-water facilities and prompt handwashing after glove removal were expected where feasible. Antiseptic cleaner or towels could serve as an interim alternative when facilities were infeasible, followed by soap and running water as soon as possible; the named system might be acceptable in that limited role.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-04-09
Date issued
April 9, 1992
Status
Active
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

April 9, 1992

Mr. Dean E. Thompson,
Clinical Director
Universal Health Systems, Inc.
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Thompson:

This is in response to your letter of January 20, regarding the acceptability of the Nebucid 880 "No Touch" Hand Disinfecting System and Dermocol Disinfectant Solution. Please accept our apologies for the delay in our response.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation on Occupational Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens, 29 CFR 1910.1030, requires in sections (d)(2)(iii) and (v) that "employers shall provide handwashing facilities which are readily accessible to employees" and "ensure that employees wash their hands immediately or as soon as feasible after removal of gloves or other personal protective equipment".

In section (d)(2)(iv), the standard permits an alternative to the standard handwashing facility: "When provision of handwashing facilities is not feasible, the employer shall provide either an appropriate antiseptic hand cleaner in conjunction with clean cloth/paper towels or antiseptic towellettes. When antiseptic hand cleaners or towellettes are used, hands shall be washed with soap and running water as soon as feasible".

These requirements are based on testimony resulting from OSHA's proposed regulation and on the Centers for Disease Control's "Guidelines for Handwashing and Hospital Environmental Control". The latter states that handwashing is the preferred method of infection control and that the recommended technique involves a vigorous rubbing together of all surfaces of lathered hands for at least 10 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing under a stream of water.

The above-mentioned antiseptic alternative is allowed as an interim measure where an employer can show that soap and water are not a feasible means of handwashing, e.g. for ambulance-based paramedics, firefighters, or mobile blood collection personnel.

The Nebucid 880 may be acceptable as an alternative handwashing technique and may certainly be used following regular handwashing as a supplementary cleanser. However, where handwashing facilities are feasible, OSHA expects employers to provide them and ensure their use.

We hope this information is responsive to your concerns. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,
Patricia K. Clark, Director
Directorate of Compliance Programs

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace