Back to Federal guidance

Historical injury logging during a commute home

Summary A company asked whether an injury after a worker left its parking lot on the normal commute home belonged on the former OSHA Log 200. OSHA said the normal commute was not work related under its then-current recordkeeping guidance, so the injury was not logged. OSHA archives the letter and warns that it may no longer reflect current policy.
Document
Federal opinion letter
Agency
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Document number
1992-03-31-1
Date issued
March 31, 1992
Status
Archived by the agency
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. The letter addresses former OSHA Log 200 procedures.
Status last verified October 9, 2026

Apply this to your situation

This page explains the general guidance. Ask about your specific situation and see what current federal labor law says, with citations.

The current status of this document is unclear
OSHA labels this an archive document and warns that it may no longer represent OSHA policy. The letter addresses former OSHA Log 200 procedures. It may no longer reflect the agency's current position. Treat this page as historical context, not current guidance, and verify current law before relying on anything here.
About this page: The full text below is the official document from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Ezel adds the plain-English summary and tracks the document's status. The official source linked on this page is authoritative for any reliance.

NOTICE: This is an OSHA Archive Document, and may no longer represent OSHA Policy. It is presented here as historical content, for research and review purposes only.

March 31, 1992

Mr. Carl Richardson
Manager,
Safety & Health
H. B. Zachry Company
[Recipient address omitted]
Dear Mr. Richardson:

Thank you for your letter of February 10, requesting an interpretation of recordability on the OSHA Log 200. As stated in your letter, the OSHA definition of work environment is primarily composed of: (1) The employer's premises, and (2) other locations where employees are engaged in work-related activities or are present as a condition of their employment. The employer's premises encompass the total establishment. These definitions are found on pages 32 through 35, Questions C-1 to C-12, of the enclosed Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses.

When an injury or illness occurs on the employer's premises, work relationship is presumed. There are however, two areas where this presumption does not apply. These are 1) company controlled recreational facilities, and 2) the company parking lot (page 33, questions C-2 and C-3). With one exception, the specific activity the employee was engaged in at the time is not the controlling factor (page 32, Question C-1). The only exception to this rule involves an employee's normal commute to and from work. This activity is not considered work related (page 36, Question C-19).

In the situation described in your letter, the employee had left the parking lot and was engaged in his/her normal commute home. Therefore, as explained above, the resulting injury should not be recorded on the OSHA Log.

In the upcoming revision to the recordkeeping system, we will be considering other potential exclusions to the definition of premises. We invite you to submit any comments you may have on this topic.

If you have any further questions or comments, please contact my staff at Area Code (202) 523-1463.

Sincerely,
STEPHEN A. NEWELL
Acting Director
Office of Statistics

Enclosure

What does federal law require in your situation?

Ezel checks current federal labor law against your facts and answers with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace